<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores><citationCount>0</citationCount><reanalysisCount>0</reanalysisCount><viewCount>62</viewCount><searchCount>0</searchCount></scores><additional><submitter>Xu S</submitter><funding>Key Research Project of Chinese Academy of Sciences</funding><funding>Science and Technology Development Project of Changchun of China</funding><funding>Cooperative Project between CAS and Jilin Province of China</funding><funding>National Natural Science Foundation of China</funding><funding>Department of Science and Technology of Jilin Province</funding><funding>Natural Science Foundation of Jilin Province</funding><funding>National Key Research and Development Program of China</funding><pagination>2</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC7227295</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>15(1)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Soil carbon (C) plays a critical role in the global C cycle and has a profound effect on climate change. To obtain an in-depth and comprehensive understanding of global soil C changes and better manage soil C, all meta-analysis results published during 2001-2019 relative to soil C were collected and synthesized. The effects of 33 influencing factors on soil C were analyzed, compared and classified into 5 grades according to their effects on soil C. The effects of different categories of influencing factors, including land use change (LUC), management and climate change, on soil C and the underlying mechanism were compared and discussed. We propose that natural ecosystems have the capacity to buffer soil C changes and that increasing C inputs is one of the best measures to sequester C. Furthermore, a comparison between the meta-analyses and previous studies related to soil C based on bibliometric analysis suggested that studies on wetland soil C, soil C budgets and the effects of pollution and pesticides on soil C should be strengthened in future research.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Carbon balance and management</journal><pubmed_title>Changing soil carbon: influencing factors, sequestration strategy and research direction.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC7227295</pmcid><funding_grant_id>20180520090JH</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>41920104008</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>18DY019</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>20190303070SF</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>2019SYHZ0039</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>41807049</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>41571255</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>20180519002JH</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>2016YFC0501202</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>KFZD-SW-112</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Xu S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tian C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sheng C</pubmed_authors><view_count>62</view_count></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Changing soil carbon: influencing factors, sequestration strategy and research direction.</name><description>Soil carbon (C) plays a critical role in the global C cycle and has a profound effect on climate change. To obtain an in-depth and comprehensive understanding of global soil C changes and better manage soil C, all meta-analysis results published during 2001-2019 relative to soil C were collected and synthesized. The effects of 33 influencing factors on soil C were analyzed, compared and classified into 5 grades according to their effects on soil C. The effects of different categories of influencing factors, including land use change (LUC), management and climate change, on soil C and the underlying mechanism were compared and discussed. We propose that natural ecosystems have the capacity to buffer soil C changes and that increasing C inputs is one of the best measures to sequester C. Furthermore, a comparison between the meta-analyses and previous studies related to soil C based on bibliometric analysis suggested that studies on wetland soil C, soil C budgets and the effects of pollution and pesticides on soil C should be strengthened in future research.</description><dates><release>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2020 Feb</publication><modification>2021-02-20T23:43:34Z</modification><creation>2020-05-31T07:02:37Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC7227295</accession><cross_references><pubmed>32067129</pubmed><doi>10.1186/s13021-020-0137-5</doi></cross_references></HashMap>