<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Raue PJ</submitter><funding>NIMH NIH HHS</funding><funding>National Institute of Mental Health</funding><pagination>445-452</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC7269871</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>25(3)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>We examined: 1. depression rates among senior center clients; and 2. the acceptability of a lay-delivered intervention for depression ("Do More, Feel Better") from the perspective of key stakeholders prior to its implementation.&lt;h4>Method&lt;/h4>We conducted cross-sectional surveys at four Seattle-area senior centers of 140 clients, 124 volunteers, and 12 administrators and staff. Client measures included the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) to determine depression severity, and items assessing depression treatment preferences. Following description of "Do More, Feel Better" as a lay-delivered intervention focused on increasing participation in rewarding activities, we used quantitative and qualitative items to assess acceptability to: 1. clients participating in; 2. v</pubmed_abstract><journal>Aging &amp; mental health</journal><pubmed_title>Acceptability of a lay-delivered intervention for depression in senior centers.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC7269871</pmcid><funding_grant_id>R34 MH111849</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Kaplan C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Russo J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Petersky C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hoeft T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ferguson D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dawson A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Green L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Raue PJ</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Acceptability of a lay-delivered intervention for depression in senior centers.</name><description>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>We examined: 1. depression rates among senior center clients; and 2. the acceptability of a lay-delivered intervention for depression ("Do More, Feel Better") from the perspective of key stakeholders prior to its implementation.&lt;h4>Method&lt;/h4>We conducted cross-sectional surveys at four Seattle-area senior centers of 140 clients, 124 volunteers, and 12 administrators and staff. Client measures included the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) to determine depression severity, and items assessing depression treatment preferences. Following description of "Do More, Feel Better" as a lay-delivered intervention focused on increasing participation in rewarding activities, we used quantitative and qualitative items to assess acceptability to: 1. clients participating in; 2. v</description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021 Mar</publication><modification>2025-04-04T22:33:05.55Z</modification><creation>2025-02-19T03:24:01.081Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC7269871</accession><cross_references><pubmed>31799880</pubmed><doi>10.1080/13607863.2019.1698515</doi></cross_references></HashMap>