<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>11</volume><submitter>Raffaelli B</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;b>Background:&lt;/b> German authorities reimburse migraine prevention with erenumab only in patients who previously did not have therapeutic success with at least five oral prophylactics or have contraindications to such. In this real-world analysis, we assessed treatment response to erenumab in patients with chronic migraine (CM) who failed five oral prophylactics and, in addition, onabotulinumtoxinA (BoNTA). &lt;b>Methods:&lt;/b> We analyzed retrospective data of 139 CM patients with at least one injection of erenumab from two German headache centers. Patients previously did not respond sufficiently or had contraindications to β-blockers, flunarizine, topiramate, amitriptyline, valproate, and BoNTA. Primary endpoint of this analysis was the mean change in monthly headache days from the 4-weeks b</pubmed_abstract><journal>Frontiers in neurology</journal><pagination>417</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC7270347</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Erenumab in Chronic Migraine Patients Who Previously Failed Five First-Line Oral Prophylactics and OnabotulinumtoxinA: A Dual-Center Retrospective Observational Study.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC7270347</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Mecklenburg J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Raffaelli B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kalantzis R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Neeb L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gendolla A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Reuter U</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Overeem LH</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Erenumab in Chronic Migraine Patients Who Previously Failed Five First-Line Oral Prophylactics and OnabotulinumtoxinA: A Dual-Center Retrospective Observational Study.</name><description>&lt;b>Background:&lt;/b> German authorities reimburse migraine prevention with erenumab only in patients who previously did not have therapeutic success with at least five oral prophylactics or have contraindications to such. In this real-world analysis, we assessed treatment response to erenumab in patients with chronic migraine (CM) who failed five oral prophylactics and, in addition, onabotulinumtoxinA (BoNTA). &lt;b>Methods:&lt;/b> We analyzed retrospective data of 139 CM patients with at least one injection of erenumab from two German headache centers. Patients previously did not respond sufficiently or had contraindications to β-blockers, flunarizine, topiramate, amitriptyline, valproate, and BoNTA. Primary endpoint of this analysis was the mean change in monthly headache days from the 4-weeks b</description><dates><release>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2020</publication><modification>2025-04-04T08:03:49.9Z</modification><creation>2020-06-19T07:00:55Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC7270347</accession><cross_references><pubmed>32547474</pubmed><doi>10.3389/fneur.2020.00417</doi></cross_references></HashMap>