<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>10(5)</volume><submitter>Markousis-Mavrogenis G</submitter><pubmed_abstract>AIMS:T1-mapping is considered a surrogate marker of acute myocardial inflammation. However, in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc) this might be confounded by coexisting myocardial fibrosis. We hypothesized that T1-based indices should not by themselves be considered as indicators of myocardial inflammation in dcSSc patients. METHODS/RESULTS:A cohort of 59 dcSSc and 34 infectious myocarditis patients was prospectively evaluated using a 1.5-Tesla system for an indication of suspected myocardial inflammation and was compared with 31 healthy controls. Collectively, 33 (97%) and 57 (98%) of myocarditis and dcSSc patients respectively had ?1 pathologic T2-based index. However, 33 (97%) and 45 (76%) of myocarditis and dcSSc patients respectively had ?1 pathologic T2-based index. T2-signal ratio was significantly higher in myocarditis patients compared with dcSSc patients (2.5 (0.6) vs. 2.1 (0.4), p &lt; 0.001). Early gadolinium enhancement, late gadolinium enhancement and T2-mapping did not differ significantly between groups. However, both native T1-mapping and extracellular volume fraction were significantly lower in myocarditis compared with dcSSc patients (1051.0 (1027.0, 1099.0) vs. 1120.0 (1065.0, 1170.0), p &lt; 0.001 and 28.0 (26.0, 30.0) vs. 31.5 (30.0, 33.0), p &lt; 0.001, respectively). The original Lake Louise criteria (LLc) were positive in 34 (100%) myocarditis and 40 (69%) dcSSc patients, while the updated LLc were positive in 32 (94%) and 44 (76%) patients, respectively. Both criteria had good agreement with greater but nonsignificant discordance in dcSSc patients. CONCLUSIONS:~25% of dcSSc patients with suspected myocardial inflammation had no CMR evidence of acute inflammatory processes. T1-based indices should not be used by themselves as surrogates of acute myocardial inflammation in dcSSc patients.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)</journal><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC7278005</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>The Doubled-Edged Sword of T1-Mapping in Systemic Sclerosis-A Comparison with Infectious Myocarditis Using Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC7278005</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Kolovou G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sfikakis PP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Koutsogeorgopoulou L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Katsifis G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dimitroulas T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kitas GD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Markousis-Mavrogenis G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mavrogeni SI</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>The Doubled-Edged Sword of T1-Mapping in Systemic Sclerosis-A Comparison with Infectious Myocarditis Using Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.</name><description>AIMS:T1-mapping is considered a surrogate marker of acute myocardial inflammation. However, in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc) this might be confounded by coexisting myocardial fibrosis. We hypothesized that T1-based indices should not by themselves be considered as indicators of myocardial inflammation in dcSSc patients. METHODS/RESULTS:A cohort of 59 dcSSc and 34 infectious myocarditis patients was prospectively evaluated using a 1.5-Tesla system for an indication of suspected myocardial inflammation and was compared with 31 healthy controls. Collectively, 33 (97%) and 57 (98%) of myocarditis and dcSSc patients respectively had ?1 pathologic T2-based index. However, 33 (97%) and 45 (76%) of myocarditis and dcSSc patients respectively had ?1 pathologic T2-based index. T2-signal ratio was significantly higher in myocarditis patients compared with dcSSc patients (2.5 (0.6) vs. 2.1 (0.4), p &lt; 0.001). Early gadolinium enhancement, late gadolinium enhancement and T2-mapping did not differ significantly between groups. However, both native T1-mapping and extracellular volume fraction were significantly lower in myocarditis compared with dcSSc patients (1051.0 (1027.0, 1099.0) vs. 1120.0 (1065.0, 1170.0), p &lt; 0.001 and 28.0 (26.0, 30.0) vs. 31.5 (30.0, 33.0), p &lt; 0.001, respectively). The original Lake Louise criteria (LLc) were positive in 34 (100%) myocarditis and 40 (69%) dcSSc patients, while the updated LLc were positive in 32 (94%) and 44 (76%) patients, respectively. Both criteria had good agreement with greater but nonsignificant discordance in dcSSc patients. CONCLUSIONS:~25% of dcSSc patients with suspected myocardial inflammation had no CMR evidence of acute inflammatory processes. T1-based indices should not be used by themselves as surrogates of acute myocardial inflammation in dcSSc patients.</description><dates><release>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2020 May</publication><modification>2020-06-16T07:21:21Z</modification><creation>2020-06-16T07:21:21Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC7278005</accession><cross_references><pubmed>32456347</pubmed><doi>10.3390/diagnostics10050335 </doi></cross_references></HashMap>