<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Cole JH</submitter><funding>UKRI) Innovation Fellowship</funding><funding>Medical Research Council</funding><pagination>34-42</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC7280786</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>92</volume><pubmed_abstract>The brain-age paradigm is proving increasingly useful for exploring aging-related disease and can predict important future health outcomes. Most brain-age research uses structural neuroimaging to index brain volume. However, aging affects multiple aspects of brain structure and function, which can be examined using multimodality neuroimaging. Using UK Biobank, brain-age was modeled in n = 2205 healthy people with T1-weighted MRI, T2-FLAIR, T2∗, diffusion-MRI, task fMRI, and resting-state fMRI. In a held-out healthy validation set (n = 520), chronological age was accurately predicted (r = 0.78, mean absolute error = 3.55 years) using LASSO regression, higher than using any modality separately. Thirty-four neuroimaging phenotypes were deemed informative by the regression (after bootstrapping); predominantly gray-matter volume and white-matter microstructure measures. When applied to new individuals from UK Biobank (n = 14,701), significant associations with multimodality brain-predicted age difference (brain-PAD) were found for stroke history, diabetes diagnosis, smoking, alcohol intake and some, but not all, cognitive measures (corrected p &lt; 0.05). Multimodality neuroimaging can improve brain-age prediction, and derived brain-PAD values are sensitive to biomedical and lifestyle factors that negatively impact brain and cognitive health.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Neurobiology of aging</journal><pubmed_title>Multimodality neuroimaging brain-age in UK biobank: relationship to biomedical, lifestyle, and cognitive factors.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC7280786</pmcid><funding_grant_id>MC_PC_17228</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>MR/R024790/1</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>MR/R024790/2</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>MC_QA137853</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>MR/R024790/1; MR/R024790/2</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Cole JH</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Multimodality neuroimaging brain-age in UK biobank: relationship to biomedical, lifestyle, and cognitive factors.</name><description>The brain-age paradigm is proving increasingly useful for exploring aging-related disease and can predict important future health outcomes. Most brain-age research uses structural neuroimaging to index brain volume. However, aging affects multiple aspects of brain structure and function, which can be examined using multimodality neuroimaging. Using UK Biobank, brain-age was modeled in n = 2205 healthy people with T1-weighted MRI, T2-FLAIR, T2∗, diffusion-MRI, task fMRI, and resting-state fMRI. In a held-out healthy validation set (n = 520), chronological age was accurately predicted (r = 0.78, mean absolute error = 3.55 years) using LASSO regression, higher than using any modality separately. Thirty-four neuroimaging phenotypes were deemed informative by the regression (after bootstrapping); predominantly gray-matter volume and white-matter microstructure measures. When applied to new individuals from UK Biobank (n = 14,701), significant associations with multimodality brain-predicted age difference (brain-PAD) were found for stroke history, diabetes diagnosis, smoking, alcohol intake and some, but not all, cognitive measures (corrected p &lt; 0.05). Multimodality neuroimaging can improve brain-age prediction, and derived brain-PAD values are sensitive to biomedical and lifestyle factors that negatively impact brain and cognitive health.</description><dates><release>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2020 Aug</publication><modification>2025-04-05T15:20:51.94Z</modification><creation>2025-04-05T15:20:51.94Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC7280786</accession><cross_references><pubmed>32380363</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2020.03.014</doi></cross_references></HashMap>