<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Yun JW</submitter><funding>Korea Health Industry Development Institute</funding><funding>National Research Foundation</funding><pagination>166</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC7339451</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>21(1)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Gene fusions have been studied extensively, as frequent drivers of tumorigenesis as well as potential therapeutic targets. In many well-known cases, breakpoints occur at two intragenic positions, leading to in-frame gene-gene fusions that generate chimeric mRNAs. However, fusions often occur with intergenic breakpoints, and the role of such fusions has not been carefully examined.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>We analyze whole-genome sequencing data from 268 patients to catalog gene-intergenic and intergenic-intergenic fusions and characterize their impact. First, we discover that, in contrast to the common assumption, chimeric oncogenic transcripts-such as those involving ETV4, ERG, RSPO3, and PIK3CA-can be generated by gene-intergenic fusions through splicing of the intervening region. Second, we find that over-expression of an upstream or downstream gene by a fusion-mediated repositioning of a regulatory sequence is much more common than previously suspected, with enhancers sometimes located megabases away. We detect a number of recurrent fusions, such as those involving ANO3, RGS9, FUT5, CHI3L1, OR1D4, and LIPG in breast; IGF2 in colon; ETV1 in prostate; and IGF2BP3 and SIX2 in thyroid cancers.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>Our findings elucidate the potential oncogenic function of intergenic fusions and highlight the wide-ranging consequences of structural rearrangements in cancer genomes.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Genome biology</journal><pubmed_title>Dysregulation of cancer genes by recurrent intergenic fusions.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC7339451</pmcid><funding_grant_id>HI15C3224</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>NRF-2016H1A2A1907938</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>HI13C2096</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Noh KW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Park PJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Choi YL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yang L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cha H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lee CW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shin HT</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Park HY</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Park WY</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yun JW</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Dysregulation of cancer genes by recurrent intergenic fusions.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Gene fusions have been studied extensively, as frequent drivers of tumorigenesis as well as potential therapeutic targets. In many well-known cases, breakpoints occur at two intragenic positions, leading to in-frame gene-gene fusions that generate chimeric mRNAs. However, fusions often occur with intergenic breakpoints, and the role of such fusions has not been carefully examined.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>We analyze whole-genome sequencing data from 268 patients to catalog gene-intergenic and intergenic-intergenic fusions and characterize their impact. First, we discover that, in contrast to the common assumption, chimeric oncogenic transcripts-such as those involving ETV4, ERG, RSPO3, and PIK3CA-can be generated by gene-intergenic fusions through splicing of the intervening region. Second, we find that over-expression of an upstream or downstream gene by a fusion-mediated repositioning of a regulatory sequence is much more common than previously suspected, with enhancers sometimes located megabases away. We detect a number of recurrent fusions, such as those involving ANO3, RGS9, FUT5, CHI3L1, OR1D4, and LIPG in breast; IGF2 in colon; ETV1 in prostate; and IGF2BP3 and SIX2 in thyroid cancers.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>Our findings elucidate the potential oncogenic function of intergenic fusions and highlight the wide-ranging consequences of structural rearrangements in cancer genomes.</description><dates><release>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2020 Jul</publication><modification>2025-04-26T08:08:46.67Z</modification><creation>2025-04-06T12:38:50.435Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC7339451</accession><cross_references><pubmed>32631391</pubmed><doi>10.1186/s13059-020-02076-2</doi></cross_references></HashMap>