<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>6(4)</volume><submitter>Douglas KM</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Cognitive impairment is considered a core feature of major depressive disorder (MDD) and research into psychological treatments aiming to address cognitive impairment are gaining momentum. Compared with the well-established research base of cognitive treatment trials in schizophrenia, including meta-analyses, mood disorder research is much more preliminary.&lt;h4>Aims&lt;/h4>To focus on identifying the important factors to consider in developing larger-scale psychological treatment trials targeting cognitive impairment in mood disorders. Trial design recommendations have been published for cognitive treatment trials in bipolar disorder.&lt;h4>Method&lt;/h4>An in-depth discussion of methodological considerations in the development of cognitive treatment trials for MDD.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Methodological considerations include: screening for, and defining, cognitive impairment; mood state when cognitive intervention begins; medication monitoring during cognitive interventions; use of concomitant therapy; level of therapist involvement; duration and dose of treatment; choice of specific cognitive training exercises; home practice; improving adherence; appropriate comparison therapies in clinical trials; and choice of primary outcomes.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>As well as guidance for clinical trial development, this review may be helpful for clinicians wanting to provide cognitive interventions for individuals with MDD.</pubmed_abstract><journal>BJPsych open</journal><pagination>e67</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC7345587</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Clinical and methodological considerations for psychological treatment of cognitive impairment in major depressive disorder.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC7345587</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Douglas KM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bowie CR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Milanovic M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Porter RJ</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Clinical and methodological considerations for psychological treatment of cognitive impairment in major depressive disorder.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Cognitive impairment is considered a core feature of major depressive disorder (MDD) and research into psychological treatments aiming to address cognitive impairment are gaining momentum. Compared with the well-established research base of cognitive treatment trials in schizophrenia, including meta-analyses, mood disorder research is much more preliminary.&lt;h4>Aims&lt;/h4>To focus on identifying the important factors to consider in developing larger-scale psychological treatment trials targeting cognitive impairment in mood disorders. Trial design recommendations have been published for cognitive treatment trials in bipolar disorder.&lt;h4>Method&lt;/h4>An in-depth discussion of methodological considerations in the development of cognitive treatment trials for MDD.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Methodological considerations include: screening for, and defining, cognitive impairment; mood state when cognitive intervention begins; medication monitoring during cognitive interventions; use of concomitant therapy; level of therapist involvement; duration and dose of treatment; choice of specific cognitive training exercises; home practice; improving adherence; appropriate comparison therapies in clinical trials; and choice of primary outcomes.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>As well as guidance for clinical trial development, this review may be helpful for clinicians wanting to provide cognitive interventions for individuals with MDD.</description><dates><release>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2020 Jun</publication><modification>2025-04-22T19:33:07.413Z</modification><creation>2025-04-06T02:46:31.75Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC7345587</accession><cross_references><pubmed>32594951</pubmed><doi>10.1192/bjo.2020.53</doi></cross_references></HashMap>