{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["22(6)"],"submitter":["Jibb LA"],"pubmed_abstract":["<h4>Background</h4>The most commonly used means to assess pain is by patient self-reported questionnaires. These questionnaires have traditionally been completed using paper-and-pencil, telephone, or in-person methods, which may limit the validity of the collected data. Electronic data capture methods represent a potential way to validly, reliably, and feasibly collect pain-related data from patients in both clinical and research settings.<h4>Objective</h4>The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare electronic and conventional pain-related data collection methods with respect to pain score equivalence, data completeness, ease of use, efficiency, and acceptability between methods.<h4>Methods</h4>We searched the Medical Literature Analysis and Retrie"],"journal":["Journal of medical Internet research"],"pagination":["e16480"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC7351264"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"pubmed_title":["Electronic Data Capture Versus Conventional Data Collection Methods in Clinical Pain Studies: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis."],"pmcid":["PMC7351264"],"pubmed_authors":["Seth P","Chee-A-Tow A","Kaur H","Foster J","Nowak DA","Nicholson K","Jibb LA","Mulrooney L","Khan JS","Stinson JN","Lalloo C"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Electronic Data Capture Versus Conventional Data Collection Methods in Clinical Pain Studies: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","description":"<h4>Background</h4>The most commonly used means to assess pain is by patient self-reported questionnaires. These questionnaires have traditionally been completed using paper-and-pencil, telephone, or in-person methods, which may limit the validity of the collected data. Electronic data capture methods represent a potential way to validly, reliably, and feasibly collect pain-related data from patients in both clinical and research settings.<h4>Objective</h4>The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare electronic and conventional pain-related data collection methods with respect to pain score equivalence, data completeness, ease of use, efficiency, and acceptability between methods.<h4>Methods</h4>We searched the Medical Literature Analysis and Retrie","dates":{"release":"2020-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2020 Jun","modification":"2026-07-15T23:41:18.713Z","creation":"2025-04-19T23:03:37.478Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC7351264","cross_references":{"pubmed":["32348259"],"doi":["10.2196/16480"]}}