<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>9(3)</volume><submitter>Nattinen J</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>The purpose of this study was to examine the protein profile differences between capillary and Schirmer strip tear fluid samples.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Both capillary and Schirmer strip tear samples were collected from 31 healthy participants at the same visit, and the samples were analyzed with nanoflow liquid chromatography coupled with time-of-flight mass spectrometer (NanoLC-MSTOF), implementing a sequential window acquisition of all theoretical fragment ion spectra mass spectrometry (SWATH-MS). Sample type-specific and combined spectral libraries were used to evaluate the differences between the sample types in protein expression levels and biological functions.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>In proportion, more extracellular proteins connected to immune response were quantified from the cap</pubmed_abstract><journal>Translational vision science &amp; technology</journal><pagination>16</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC7351636</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Comparison of Capillary and Schirmer Strip Tear Fluid Sampling Methods Using SWATH-MS Proteomics Approach.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC7351636</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Uusitalo H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jylha A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nattinen J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Aapola U</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vaajanen A</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Comparison of Capillary and Schirmer Strip Tear Fluid Sampling Methods Using SWATH-MS Proteomics Approach.</name><description>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>The purpose of this study was to examine the protein profile differences between capillary and Schirmer strip tear fluid samples.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Both capillary and Schirmer strip tear samples were collected from 31 healthy participants at the same visit, and the samples were analyzed with nanoflow liquid chromatography coupled with time-of-flight mass spectrometer (NanoLC-MSTOF), implementing a sequential window acquisition of all theoretical fragment ion spectra mass spectrometry (SWATH-MS). Sample type-specific and combined spectral libraries were used to evaluate the differences between the sample types in protein expression levels and biological functions.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>In proportion, more extracellular proteins connected to immune response were quantified from the cap</description><dates><release>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2020 Feb</publication><modification>2025-04-19T21:09:53.228Z</modification><creation>2025-02-19T00:51:45.425Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC7351636</accession><cross_references><pubmed>32714642</pubmed><doi>10.1167/tvst.9.3.16</doi></cross_references></HashMap>