<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Howren MB</submitter><funding>NIDDK NIH HHS</funding><pagination>167-76</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC7362302</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>50(2)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of a behavioral self-regulation intervention vs. active control condition using a parallel-group randomized clinical trial with a sample of center hemodialysis patients with chronic kidney disease.&lt;h4>Method&lt;/h4>Participants were recruited from 8 hemodialysis treatment centers in the Midwest. Eligible patients were (a) fluid nonadherent as defined by an interdialytic weight gain >2.5 kg over a 4-week period, (b) >18 years of age, (c) English-speaking without severe cognitive impairment, (d) treated with center-based hemodialysis for >3 months, and (e) not living in a care facility in which meals were managed. Medical records were used to identify eligible patients. Patients were randomly assigned to either a behavioral self-regulation intervention or active control condition in which groups of 3-8 patients met for hour-long, weekly sessions for 7 weeks at their usual hemodialysis clinic. Primary analyses were intention-to-treat.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Sixty-one patients were randomized to the intervention while 58 were assigned to the attention-placebo support and discussion control. Covariate-adjusted between-subjects analyses demonstrated no unique intervention effect for the primary outcome, interdialytic weight gain (β = 0.13, p = 0.48). Significant within-subjects improvement over time was observed for the intervention group (β = -0.32, p = 0.014).&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>The present study found that participation in a behavioral self-regulation intervention resulted in no unique intervention effect on a key indicator of adherence for those with severe chronic kidney disease. There was, however, modest within-subjects improvement in interdialytic weight gain for the intervention group which meshes with other evidence showing the utility of behavioral interventions in this patient population. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01066949.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine</journal><pubmed_title>Effect of a Behavioral Self-Regulation Intervention on Patient Adherence to Fluid-Intake Restrictions in Hemodialysis: a Randomized Controlled Trial.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC7362302</pmcid><funding_grant_id>R01 DK072325</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01DK072325</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Cvengros J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Christensen AJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lawton W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kellerman QD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Howren MB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hillis SL</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Effect of a Behavioral Self-Regulation Intervention on Patient Adherence to Fluid-Intake Restrictions in Hemodialysis: a Randomized Controlled Trial.</name><description>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of a behavioral self-regulation intervention vs. active control condition using a parallel-group randomized clinical trial with a sample of center hemodialysis patients with chronic kidney disease.&lt;h4>Method&lt;/h4>Participants were recruited from 8 hemodialysis treatment centers in the Midwest. Eligible patients were (a) fluid nonadherent as defined by an interdialytic weight gain >2.5 kg over a 4-week period, (b) >18 years of age, (c) English-speaking without severe cognitive impairment, (d) treated with center-based hemodialysis for >3 months, and (e) not living in a care facility in which meals were managed. Medical records were used to identify eligible patients. Patients were randomly assigned to either a behavioral self-regulation intervention or active control condition in which groups of 3-8 patients met for hour-long, weekly sessions for 7 weeks at their usual hemodialysis clinic. Primary analyses were intention-to-treat.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Sixty-one patients were randomized to the intervention while 58 were assigned to the attention-placebo support and discussion control. Covariate-adjusted between-subjects analyses demonstrated no unique intervention effect for the primary outcome, interdialytic weight gain (β = 0.13, p = 0.48). Significant within-subjects improvement over time was observed for the intervention group (β = -0.32, p = 0.014).&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>The present study found that participation in a behavioral self-regulation intervention resulted in no unique intervention effect on a key indicator of adherence for those with severe chronic kidney disease. There was, however, modest within-subjects improvement in interdialytic weight gain for the intervention group which meshes with other evidence showing the utility of behavioral interventions in this patient population. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01066949.</description><dates><release>2016-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2016 Apr</publication><modification>2025-05-29T20:47:39.418Z</modification><creation>2020-11-07T09:53:59Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC7362302</accession><cross_references><pubmed>26631085</pubmed><doi>10.1007/s12160-015-9741-0</doi></cross_references></HashMap>