<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Kecskemeti S</submitter><funding>Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison</funding><funding>Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development</funding><funding>NICHD NIH HHS</funding><funding>NIA NIH HHS</funding><funding>NIDA NIH HHS</funding><funding>NIMH NIH HHS</funding><funding>National Institutes of Health</funding><pagination>2400-2411</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC7396302</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>84(5)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>To test the performance of the MPnRAGE motion-correction algorithm on quantitative relaxometry estimates.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Twelve children (9.4 ± 2.6 years, min = 6.5 years, max = 13.8 years) were imaged 3 times in a session without sedation. Stabilization padding was not used for the second and third scans. Quantitative T&lt;sub>1&lt;/sub> values were estimated in each voxel on images reconstructed with and without motion correction. Mean T&lt;sub>1&lt;/sub> values were assessed in various regions determined from automated segmentation algorithms. Statistical tests were performed on mean values and the coefficient of variation across the measurements. Accuracy of T&lt;sub>1&lt;/sub> estimates were determined by scanning the High Precision Devices (Boulder, CO) MRI system phantom with the same protocol.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>The T&lt;sub>1&lt;/sub> values obtained with MPnRAGE agreed within 4% of the reference values of the High Precision Devices phantom. The best fit line was T&lt;sub>1&lt;/sub> (MPnRAGE) = 1.02 T&lt;sub>1&lt;/sub> (reference)-0.9 ms, R&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup>  = 0.9999. For in vivo studies, motion correction reduced the coefficients of variation of mean T&lt;sub>1&lt;/sub> values in whole-brain tissue regions determined by FSL FAST by 74% ± 7%, and subcortical regions determined by FIRST and FreeSurfer by 32% ± 21% and 33% ± 26%, respectively. Across all participants, the mean coefficients of variation ranged from 0.8% to 2.0% for subcortical regions and 0.6% ± 0.5% for cortical regions when motion correction was applied.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>The MPnRAGE technique demonstrated highly accurate values in phantom measurements. When combined with retrospective motion correction, MPnRAGE demonstrated highly reproducible T&lt;sub>1&lt;/sub> values, even in participants who moved during the acquisition.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Magnetic resonance in medicine</journal><pubmed_title>Three-dimensional motion-corrected T&lt;sub>1&lt;/sub> relaxometry with MPnRAGE.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC7396302</pmcid><funding_grant_id>AG051216</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>IDDRC U54 HD090256</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UF1 AG051216</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 AG037639</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>DA050258</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 MH097464</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R34 DA050258</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>MH100031</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>HD094715</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P50 MH100031</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>AG15001</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U01 AG051406</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 MH101504</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>MH101504</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U54 HD090256</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 HD094715</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>MH097464</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Kecskemeti S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Alexander AL</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Three-dimensional motion-corrected T&lt;sub>1&lt;/sub> relaxometry with MPnRAGE.</name><description>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>To test the performance of the MPnRAGE motion-correction algorithm on quantitative relaxometry estimates.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Twelve children (9.4 ± 2.6 years, min = 6.5 years, max = 13.8 years) were imaged 3 times in a session without sedation. Stabilization padding was not used for the second and third scans. Quantitative T&lt;sub>1&lt;/sub> values were estimated in each voxel on images reconstructed with and without motion correction. Mean T&lt;sub>1&lt;/sub> values were assessed in various regions determined from automated segmentation algorithms. Statistical tests were performed on mean values and the coefficient of variation across the measurements. Accuracy of T&lt;sub>1&lt;/sub> estimates were determined by scanning the High Precision Devices (Boulder, CO) MRI system phantom with the same protocol.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>The T&lt;sub>1&lt;/sub> values obtained with MPnRAGE agreed within 4% of the reference values of the High Precision Devices phantom. The best fit line was T&lt;sub>1&lt;/sub> (MPnRAGE) = 1.02 T&lt;sub>1&lt;/sub> (reference)-0.9 ms, R&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup>  = 0.9999. For in vivo studies, motion correction reduced the coefficients of variation of mean T&lt;sub>1&lt;/sub> values in whole-brain tissue regions determined by FSL FAST by 74% ± 7%, and subcortical regions determined by FIRST and FreeSurfer by 32% ± 21% and 33% ± 26%, respectively. Across all participants, the mean coefficients of variation ranged from 0.8% to 2.0% for subcortical regions and 0.6% ± 0.5% for cortical regions when motion correction was applied.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>The MPnRAGE technique demonstrated highly accurate values in phantom measurements. When combined with retrospective motion correction, MPnRAGE demonstrated highly reproducible T&lt;sub>1&lt;/sub> values, even in participants who moved during the acquisition.</description><dates><release>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2020 Nov</publication><modification>2025-04-04T21:57:36.048Z</modification><creation>2022-02-11T12:15:17.564Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC7396302</accession><cross_references><pubmed>32301173</pubmed><doi>10.1002/mrm.28283</doi></cross_references></HashMap>