<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>17(14)</volume><submitter>Mavani HAK</submitter><pubmed_abstract>Sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), an effective endodontic irrigant against Enterococcus faecalis (EF), is harmful to periapical tissues. Natural pineapple-orange eco-enzymes (M-EE) and papaya eco-enzyme (P-EE) could be potential alternatives. This study aimed to assess the antimicrobial efficacy of M-EE and P-EE at different concentrations and fermentation periods against EF, compared to 2.5% NaOCl. Fermented M-EE and P-EE (3 and 6 months) at various concentrations were mixed with EF in a 96-well plate incubated for 24 h anaerobically. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of M-EE and P-EE were determined via EF growth observation. EF inhibition was quantitatively measured and compared between different irrigants using the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and different fermentation periods using the independent-samples T-test. M-EE and P-EE showed MIC at 50% and MBC at 100% concentrations. There was no significant difference in antimicrobial effect when comparing M-EE and P-EE at 50% and 100% to 2.5% NaOCl. P-EE at 6 months fermentation exhibited higher EF inhibition compared to 3 months at concentrations of 25% (p = 0.017) and 0.78% (p = 0.009). The antimicrobial properties of M-EE and P-EE, at both 100% and 50% concentrations, are comparable to 2.5% NaOCl. They could therefore be potential alternative endodontic irrigants, but further studies are required.</pubmed_abstract><journal>International journal of environmental research and public health</journal><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC7400228</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Antimicrobial Efficacy of Fruit Peels Eco-Enzyme against Enterococcus Faecalis: An In Vitro Study.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC7400228</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Tew IM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yew HZ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mavani HAK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wong L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ahmad Ghazali R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pow EHN</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mahyuddin A</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Antimicrobial Efficacy of Fruit Peels Eco-Enzyme against Enterococcus Faecalis: An In Vitro Study.</name><description>Sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), an effective endodontic irrigant against Enterococcus faecalis (EF), is harmful to periapical tissues. Natural pineapple-orange eco-enzymes (M-EE) and papaya eco-enzyme (P-EE) could be potential alternatives. This study aimed to assess the antimicrobial efficacy of M-EE and P-EE at different concentrations and fermentation periods against EF, compared to 2.5% NaOCl. Fermented M-EE and P-EE (3 and 6 months) at various concentrations were mixed with EF in a 96-well plate incubated for 24 h anaerobically. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of M-EE and P-EE were determined via EF growth observation. EF inhibition was quantitatively measured and compared between different irrigants using the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and different fermentation periods using the independent-samples T-test. M-EE and P-EE showed MIC at 50% and MBC at 100% concentrations. There was no significant difference in antimicrobial effect when comparing M-EE and P-EE at 50% and 100% to 2.5% NaOCl. P-EE at 6 months fermentation exhibited higher EF inhibition compared to 3 months at concentrations of 25% (p = 0.017) and 0.78% (p = 0.009). The antimicrobial properties of M-EE and P-EE, at both 100% and 50% concentrations, are comparable to 2.5% NaOCl. They could therefore be potential alternative endodontic irrigants, but further studies are required.</description><dates><release>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2020 Jul</publication><modification>2020-10-02T07:25:20Z</modification><creation>2020-08-27T07:01:09Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC7400228</accession><cross_references><pubmed>32679828</pubmed><doi>10.3390/ijerph17145107</doi></cross_references></HashMap>