<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Brown AW</submitter><funding>NCATS NIH HHS</funding><funding>NIDDK NIH HHS</funding><pagination>179-195</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC7434715</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>61(2)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Dairy has been described as everything from a superfood to a poison; yet, arguments, assumptions, and data justifying these labels are not always clear. We used an issue-based information system, "dialogue mapping™," to summarize scientific points of a live panel discussion on the putative effects of dairy on cardiovascular diseases (CVD) from a day-long session among experts in nutrition and CVD. Dialogue mapping captures relations among ideas to explicitly, logically, and visually connect issues/questions, ideas, pro/con arguments, and agreements, even if discussed at different times. Experts discussed two propositions: for CVD risk, consumption of full-fat dairy products 1) should be minimized, in part because of their saturated fat content, or 2) need not be minimized, despite their sa</pubmed_abstract><journal>Critical reviews in food science and nutrition</journal><pubmed_title>Science dialogue mapping of knowledge and knowledge gaps related to the effects of dairy intake on human cardiovascular health and disease.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC7434715</pmcid><funding_grant_id>P30 DK079626</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 DK056336</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UL1 TR003096</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UL1 TR001417</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Vorland CJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Teran-Garcia M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Miller M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kaiser KA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Allison DB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fontaine K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shikany JM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Brenna JT</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Maki K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gower BA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>St-Onge MP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Beitz DC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Keitt A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gibson M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jacobs DR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Brown AW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bier DM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kris-Etherton P</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Science dialogue mapping of knowledge and knowledge gaps related to the effects of dairy intake on human cardiovascular health and disease.</name><description>Dairy has been described as everything from a superfood to a poison; yet, arguments, assumptions, and data justifying these labels are not always clear. We used an issue-based information system, "dialogue mapping™," to summarize scientific points of a live panel discussion on the putative effects of dairy on cardiovascular diseases (CVD) from a day-long session among experts in nutrition and CVD. Dialogue mapping captures relations among ideas to explicitly, logically, and visually connect issues/questions, ideas, pro/con arguments, and agreements, even if discussed at different times. Experts discussed two propositions: for CVD risk, consumption of full-fat dairy products 1) should be minimized, in part because of their saturated fat content, or 2) need not be minimized, despite their sa</description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021</publication><modification>2026-05-01T12:48:39.188Z</modification><creation>2022-02-11T14:20:10.428Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC7434715</accession><cross_references><pubmed>32072820</pubmed><doi>10.1080/10408398.2020.1722941</doi></cross_references></HashMap>