<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Fix J</submitter><funding>Intramural NIH HHS</funding><funding>NIOSH</funding><funding>NIEHS NIH HHS</funding><funding>NIOSH CDC HHS</funding><funding>National Institutes of Health</funding><pagination>97-108</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC7494561</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>26(2)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;b>Purpose&lt;/b>: Respiratory hazards of farming have been identified for centuries, with little focus on gender differences. We used data from the AGRICOH consortium, a collective of prospective cohorts of agricultural workers, to assess respiratory disease prevalence among adults in 18 cohorts representing over 200,000 farmers, farm workers, and their spouses from six continents.&lt;b>Methods&lt;/b>: Cohorts collected data between 1992 and 2016 and ranged in size from 200 to >128,000 individuals; 44% of participants were female. Farming practices varied from subsistence farming to large-scale industrial agriculture. All cohorts provided respiratory outcome information for their cohort based on their study definitions. The majority of outcomes were based on self-report using standard respiratory </pubmed_abstract><journal>Journal of agromedicine</journal><pubmed_title>Gender differences in respiratory health outcomes among farming cohorts around the globe: findings from the AGRICOH consortium.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC7494561</pmcid><funding_grant_id>Z01 ES049030</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 ES005605</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U50 OH007548</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>Z01-ES049030</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>OH07548</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Parks CG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kromhout H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jeebhay M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Maesano CN</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Harding AH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ngajilo D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schenker MB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nordby KC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Boulanger M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cheng S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Thorne P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fix J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Negatu B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dalphin JC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>MacFarlane E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Baldi I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yoo KY</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Annesi-Maesano I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kelly KM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Douwes J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sigsgaard T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dalvie MA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ferreccio C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sim M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Eduard W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Degano B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Elholm G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cortes S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mitchell DC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Soumagne T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shin A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Naidoo S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mwanga H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hoppin JA</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Gender differences in respiratory health outcomes among farming cohorts around the globe: findings from the AGRICOH consortium.</name><description>&lt;b>Purpose&lt;/b>: Respiratory hazards of farming have been identified for centuries, with little focus on gender differences. We used data from the AGRICOH consortium, a collective of prospective cohorts of agricultural workers, to assess respiratory disease prevalence among adults in 18 cohorts representing over 200,000 farmers, farm workers, and their spouses from six continents.&lt;b>Methods&lt;/b>: Cohorts collected data between 1992 and 2016 and ranged in size from 200 to >128,000 individuals; 44% of participants were female. Farming practices varied from subsistence farming to large-scale industrial agriculture. All cohorts provided respiratory outcome information for their cohort based on their study definitions. The majority of outcomes were based on self-report using standard respiratory </description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021 Apr</publication><modification>2025-04-21T21:23:42.252Z</modification><creation>2025-04-05T18:22:42.533Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC7494561</accession><cross_references><pubmed>32182198</pubmed><doi>10.1080/1059924X.2020.1713274</doi><doi>10.1080/1059924x.2020.1713274</doi></cross_references></HashMap>