<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>12(8)</volume><submitter>Atkinson P</submitter><pubmed_abstract>Introduction Point of Care Ultrasound (PoCUS) protocols are commonly used to guide resuscitation for patients with undifferentiated hypotension, yet there is a paucity of evidence for any outcome benefit. We undertook an international multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) to assess the impact of a PoCUS protocol on key clinical outcomes. Here we report on resuscitation markers.  Methods Adult patients presenting to six emergency departments (ED) in Canada and South Africa with undifferentiated hypotension (systolic blood pressure (SBP) &lt;100mmHg or a Shock Index >1.0) were randomized to receive a PoCUS protocol or standard care (control). Reported physiological markers include shock index (SI), and modified early warning score (MEWS), with biochemical markers including venous bicarb</pubmed_abstract><journal>Cureus</journal><pagination>e9899</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC7505535</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Does Point of Care Ultrasound Improve Resuscitation Markers in Undifferentiated Hypotension? An International Randomized Controlled Trial From The Sonography in Hypotension and Cardiac Arrest in the Emergency Department (SHoC-ED) Series.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC7505535</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Ramrattan B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Olszynski P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Milne J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Middleton J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dahn T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hunter S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Stander M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lussier D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pham C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Banerjee A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Taylor L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Stoica G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fraser J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mekwan J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Van Hoving DJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>MacSween K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Richardson L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Diegelmann L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Howlett M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lamprecht H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Peach M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Atkinson P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Atkinson JP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Henneberry RJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hurley S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lewis D</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Does Point of Care Ultrasound Improve Resuscitation Markers in Undifferentiated Hypotension? An International Randomized Controlled Trial From The Sonography in Hypotension and Cardiac Arrest in the Emergency Department (SHoC-ED) Series.</name><description>Introduction Point of Care Ultrasound (PoCUS) protocols are commonly used to guide resuscitation for patients with undifferentiated hypotension, yet there is a paucity of evidence for any outcome benefit. We undertook an international multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) to assess the impact of a PoCUS protocol on key clinical outcomes. Here we report on resuscitation markers.  Methods Adult patients presenting to six emergency departments (ED) in Canada and South Africa with undifferentiated hypotension (systolic blood pressure (SBP) &lt;100mmHg or a Shock Index >1.0) were randomized to receive a PoCUS protocol or standard care (control). Reported physiological markers include shock index (SI), and modified early warning score (MEWS), with biochemical markers including venous bicarb</description><dates><release>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2020 Aug</publication><modification>2025-04-04T10:55:47.953Z</modification><creation>2020-10-01T07:05:18Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC7505535</accession><cross_references><pubmed>32968565</pubmed><doi>10.7759/cureus.9899</doi></cross_references></HashMap>