<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Deseyne P</submitter><funding>Stichting Tegen Kanker</funding><funding>Ghent University Industrial Research Fund, Grant StarTT 241. Bert Boute is recipient of a research grant Emmanuel van der Schueren of Kom op tegen Kanker.</funding><funding>Susan G. Komen</funding><funding>Liv Veldeman holds a Clinical Mandate of Kom op tegen Kanker)</funding><funding>FOD Volksgezondheid, Veiligheid van de Voedselketen en Leefmilieu</funding><pagination>16376</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC7532156</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>10(1)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Prone positioning for whole-breast irradiation (WBI) reduces dose to organs at risk, but reduces set-up speed, precision, and comfort. We aimed to improve these problems by placing patients in prone crawl position on a newly developed crawl couch (CrC). A group of 10 right-sided breast cancer patients requiring WBI were randomized in this cross-over trial, comparing the CrC to a standard prone breastboard (BB). Laterolateral (LL), craniocaudal (CC) and anterioposterior (AP) set-up errors were evaluated with cone beam CT. Comfort, preference and set-up time (SUT) were assessed. Forty left and right-sided breast cancer patients served as a validation group. For BB versus CrC, AP, LL and CC mean patient shifts were - 0.8 ± 2.8, 0.2 ± 11.7 and - 0.6 ± 4.4 versus - 0.2 ± 3.3, - 0.8 ± 2.5 and - 1.9 ± 5.7 mm. LL shift spread was reduced significantly. Nine out of 10 patients preferred the CrC. SUT did not differ significantly. The validation group had mean patient shifts of 1.7 ± 2.9 (AP), 0.2 ± 3.6 (LL) and - 0.2 ± 3.3 (CC) mm. Mean SUT in the validation group was 1 min longer (P &lt; 0.05) than the comparative group. Median SUT was 3 min in all groups. The CrC improved precision and comfort compared to BB. Set-up errors compare favourably to other prone-WBI trials and rival supine positioning.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Scientific reports</journal><pubmed_title>Crawl positioning improves set-up precision and patient comfort in prone whole breast irradiation.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC7532156</pmcid><funding_grant_id>FAF-C/2016/854</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>Cancer Plan Action 29</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>377841</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Depypere H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Monten C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Van Hulle H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Stouthandel M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Veldeman L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Deseyne P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Van Greveling A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Detand J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>De Neve W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Speleers B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Post G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Paelinck L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Boute B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vakaet V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schoepen M</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Crawl positioning improves set-up precision and patient comfort in prone whole breast irradiation.</name><description>Prone positioning for whole-breast irradiation (WBI) reduces dose to organs at risk, but reduces set-up speed, precision, and comfort. We aimed to improve these problems by placing patients in prone crawl position on a newly developed crawl couch (CrC). A group of 10 right-sided breast cancer patients requiring WBI were randomized in this cross-over trial, comparing the CrC to a standard prone breastboard (BB). Laterolateral (LL), craniocaudal (CC) and anterioposterior (AP) set-up errors were evaluated with cone beam CT. Comfort, preference and set-up time (SUT) were assessed. Forty left and right-sided breast cancer patients served as a validation group. For BB versus CrC, AP, LL and CC mean patient shifts were - 0.8 ± 2.8, 0.2 ± 11.7 and - 0.6 ± 4.4 versus - 0.2 ± 3.3, - 0.8 ± 2.5 and - 1.9 ± 5.7 mm. LL shift spread was reduced significantly. Nine out of 10 patients preferred the CrC. SUT did not differ significantly. The validation group had mean patient shifts of 1.7 ± 2.9 (AP), 0.2 ± 3.6 (LL) and - 0.2 ± 3.3 (CC) mm. Mean SUT in the validation group was 1 min longer (P &lt; 0.05) than the comparative group. Median SUT was 3 min in all groups. The CrC improved precision and comfort compared to BB. Set-up errors compare favourably to other prone-WBI trials and rival supine positioning.</description><dates><release>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2020 Oct</publication><modification>2024-11-08T17:48:25.598Z</modification><creation>2020-10-29T08:14:16Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC7532156</accession><cross_references><pubmed>33009448</pubmed><doi>10.1038/s41598-020-72702-3</doi></cross_references></HashMap>