<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Zaorsky NG</submitter><funding>NCI NIH HHS</funding><pagination>386-393</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC7548033</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>126(3)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background and purpose&lt;/h4>To compare cosmesis and local recurrence (LR) of definitive external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) vs brachytherapy (BT) for indolent basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the skin.&lt;h4>Materials and methods&lt;/h4>Studies including patients with T1-2 N0 SCCs/BCCs treated with definitive EBRT/BT and ≥10 months follow-up were analyzed. The primary endpoint was post-treatment cosmesis, categorized as "good," "fair," or "poor." The secondary endpoint was LR. Mixed effects regression models were used to estimate weighted linear relationships between biologically equivalent doses with α/β = 3 (BED&lt;sub>3&lt;/sub>) and cosmetic outcomes.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>A total of 9965 patients received EBRT and 553 received BT across 24 studies. Mean age was 73 ye</pubmed_abstract><journal>Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology</journal><pubmed_title>Skin CanceR Brachytherapy vs External beam radiation therapy (SCRiBE) meta-analysis.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC7548033</pmcid><funding_grant_id>P30 CA006927</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Zhang E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zaorsky NG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lee CT</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Galloway TJ</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Skin CanceR Brachytherapy vs External beam radiation therapy (SCRiBE) meta-analysis.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background and purpose&lt;/h4>To compare cosmesis and local recurrence (LR) of definitive external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) vs brachytherapy (BT) for indolent basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the skin.&lt;h4>Materials and methods&lt;/h4>Studies including patients with T1-2 N0 SCCs/BCCs treated with definitive EBRT/BT and ≥10 months follow-up were analyzed. The primary endpoint was post-treatment cosmesis, categorized as "good," "fair," or "poor." The secondary endpoint was LR. Mixed effects regression models were used to estimate weighted linear relationships between biologically equivalent doses with α/β = 3 (BED&lt;sub>3&lt;/sub>) and cosmetic outcomes.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>A total of 9965 patients received EBRT and 553 received BT across 24 studies. Mean age was 73 ye</description><dates><release>2018-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2018 Mar</publication><modification>2025-04-26T11:53:42.671Z</modification><creation>2025-04-06T13:51:20.548Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC7548033</accession><cross_references><pubmed>29370985</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.radonc.2017.12.029</doi></cross_references></HashMap>