<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>9(5)</volume><submitter>Koroki K</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has a high frequency of recurrence and progression to advanced stage after transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), particularly in patients with high tumor burden. Promising new results from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and ICI-based therapies are expected to replace TACE, especially in HCC patients with high tumor burden.&lt;h4>Aims&lt;/h4>The present study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of TACE with a view to design clinical trials comparing TACE and ICIs.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We retrospectively identified intermediate-stage HCC patients undergoing TACE from our database and subdivided patients into low- and high-burden groups based on three subclassification models using the diameter of the maximum tumor and the number of tumors. Clinical outcomes were compared between low- and high-burden intermediate-stage HCC.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Of 1,161 newly diagnosed HCC patients, 316 were diagnosed with intermediate-stage disease and underwent TACE. The median overall survival from high-burden intermediate-stage disease was not significantly different by clinical course, reaching high tumor burden in all subclassification models. The prognosis of high-burden patients after initial TACE was poor compared with low-burden patients for two models (except for the up-to-seven criteria). In all three models, high-burden patients showed a poor durable response rate (DRR) both ≥3 months and ≥6 months and poor prognosis after TACE. Moreover, patients with confirmed durable response ≥3 months and ≥6 months showed better survival outcomes for high-burden intermediate-stage HCC.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Our results demonstrate the basis for selecting a population that would not benefit from TACE and setting DRR ≥3 months or ≥6 months as alternative endpoints when designing clinical trials comparing TACE and ICIs.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Liver cancer</journal><pagination>596-612</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC7548915</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Analyses of Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Receiving Transarterial Chemoembolization prior to Designing Clinical Trials.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC7548915</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Tawada A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nakamoto S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Saito T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kanayama K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yokosuka O</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yokoyama M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yasui S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ohtsuka M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Suzuki E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kobayashi K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kanogawa N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ooka Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kuboki S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kato J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kato N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chiba T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kanda T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kanzaki H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nakamura M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Maeda T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Koroki K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wakamatsu T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Inoue M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ogasawara S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Maruta S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kondo T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Maruyama H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kiyono S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Arai M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Miyazaki M</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Analyses of Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Receiving Transarterial Chemoembolization prior to Designing Clinical Trials.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has a high frequency of recurrence and progression to advanced stage after transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), particularly in patients with high tumor burden. Promising new results from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and ICI-based therapies are expected to replace TACE, especially in HCC patients with high tumor burden.&lt;h4>Aims&lt;/h4>The present study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of TACE with a view to design clinical trials comparing TACE and ICIs.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We retrospectively identified intermediate-stage HCC patients undergoing TACE from our database and subdivided patients into low- and high-burden groups based on three subclassification models using the diameter of the maximum tumor and the number of tumors. Clinical outcomes were compared between low- and high-burden intermediate-stage HCC.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Of 1,161 newly diagnosed HCC patients, 316 were diagnosed with intermediate-stage disease and underwent TACE. The median overall survival from high-burden intermediate-stage disease was not significantly different by clinical course, reaching high tumor burden in all subclassification models. The prognosis of high-burden patients after initial TACE was poor compared with low-burden patients for two models (except for the up-to-seven criteria). In all three models, high-burden patients showed a poor durable response rate (DRR) both ≥3 months and ≥6 months and poor prognosis after TACE. Moreover, patients with confirmed durable response ≥3 months and ≥6 months showed better survival outcomes for high-burden intermediate-stage HCC.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Our results demonstrate the basis for selecting a population that would not benefit from TACE and setting DRR ≥3 months or ≥6 months as alternative endpoints when designing clinical trials comparing TACE and ICIs.</description><dates><release>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2020 Sep</publication><modification>2024-02-15T17:36:00.185Z</modification><creation>2020-10-29T12:38:17Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC7548915</accession><cross_references><pubmed>33083283</pubmed><doi>10.1159/000508809</doi></cross_references></HashMap>