<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>37(12)</volume><submitter>Thuresson PO</submitter><funding>F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd</funding><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>Novel treatment options are needed to improve outcomes in transplant-ineligible relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). This systematic literature review evaluated clinical evidence on treatments for patients with R/R DLBCL ineligible for, or relapsed following, stem cell transplantation.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We assessed the feasibility of conducting an indirect treatment comparison (ITC) or network meta-analysis (NMA) to evaluate the relative efficacy and safety of polatuzumab vedotin in combination with bendamustine + rituximab versus other relevant treatments.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Thirty-seven studies were identified, of which 20 were eligible [seven randomized, controlled trials (RCTs); 13 observational/single-arm trials]. Due to a lack of RCTs, an ITC</pubmed_abstract><journal>Advances in therapy</journal><pagination>4877-4893</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC7595978</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>A Systematic Review of the Clinical Efficacy of Treatments in Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC7595978</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Thuresson PO</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Talbot J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vander Velde N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gupta P</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>A Systematic Review of the Clinical Efficacy of Treatments in Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma.</name><description>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>Novel treatment options are needed to improve outcomes in transplant-ineligible relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). This systematic literature review evaluated clinical evidence on treatments for patients with R/R DLBCL ineligible for, or relapsed following, stem cell transplantation.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We assessed the feasibility of conducting an indirect treatment comparison (ITC) or network meta-analysis (NMA) to evaluate the relative efficacy and safety of polatuzumab vedotin in combination with bendamustine + rituximab versus other relevant treatments.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Thirty-seven studies were identified, of which 20 were eligible [seven randomized, controlled trials (RCTs); 13 observational/single-arm trials]. Due to a lack of RCTs, an ITC</description><dates><release>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2020 Dec</publication><modification>2025-04-04T20:02:40.138Z</modification><creation>2020-11-19T11:33:25Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC7595978</accession><cross_references><pubmed>33001384</pubmed><doi>10.1007/s12325-020-01507-7</doi></cross_references></HashMap>