<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Divers R</submitter><funding>NIA NIH HHS</funding><funding>Temple University</funding><funding>National Institute on Aging</funding><pagination>308-326</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC7606330</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>28(2)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Mild functional difficulties associated with cognitive aging may be reliably measured by coding "micro-errors" during everyday tasks, like meal preparation. Micro-errors made by 25 older adult and 48 younger adults were coded on four dimensions to evaluate the influence of: 1) poor error monitoring; 2) goal decay; 3) competition for response selection when switching to a new subtask; and 4) interference from distractor objects. Micro-errors made by young adults under a dual task load also were analyzed to determine the influence of overall performance level. Older adults' micro-errors were observed when switching to a new subtask and to unrelated distractors. Slowed error monitoring and goal decay also influenced micro-errors in older adults, but not significantly more so than younger adul</pubmed_abstract><journal>Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition</journal><pubmed_title>When and how did you go wrong? Characterizing mild functional difficulties in older adults during an everyday task.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC7606330</pmcid><funding_grant_id>R21AG060422</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>F31 AG069444</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R21 AG060422</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R21 AG066771</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>Diamond Research Scholars Program</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 AG062503</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Ham L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Giovannetti T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mis R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Divers R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hackett K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Matchanova A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Howard K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rycroft SS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Roll E</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>When and how did you go wrong? Characterizing mild functional difficulties in older adults during an everyday task.</name><description>Mild functional difficulties associated with cognitive aging may be reliably measured by coding "micro-errors" during everyday tasks, like meal preparation. Micro-errors made by 25 older adult and 48 younger adults were coded on four dimensions to evaluate the influence of: 1) poor error monitoring; 2) goal decay; 3) competition for response selection when switching to a new subtask; and 4) interference from distractor objects. Micro-errors made by young adults under a dual task load also were analyzed to determine the influence of overall performance level. Older adults' micro-errors were observed when switching to a new subtask and to unrelated distractors. Slowed error monitoring and goal decay also influenced micro-errors in older adults, but not significantly more so than younger adul</description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021 Mar</publication><modification>2025-04-03T23:32:23.699Z</modification><creation>2025-02-18T23:53:03.553Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC7606330</accession><cross_references><pubmed>32352347</pubmed><doi>10.1080/13825585.2020.1756210</doi></cross_references></HashMap>