<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Armstrong AG</submitter><funding>Wellcome Trust</funding><pagination>717-730</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC7612903</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>6(6)</volume><pubmed_abstract>In quiet environments, hearing aids improve the perception of low-intensity sounds. However, for high-intensity sounds in background noise, the aids often fail to provide a benefit to the wearer. Here, using large-scale single-neuron recordings from hearing-impaired gerbils-an established animal model of human hearing-we show that hearing aids restore the sensitivity of neural responses to speech, but not their selectivity. Rather than reflecting a deficit in supra-threshold auditory processing, the low selectivity is a consequence of hearing-aid compression (which decreases the spectral and temporal contrasts of incoming sound) and amplification (which distorts neural responses, regardless of whether hearing is impaired). Processing strategies that avoid the trade-off between neural sensitivity and selectivity should improve the performance of hearing aids.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Nature biomedical engineering</journal><pubmed_title>Compression and amplification algorithms in hearing aids impair the selectivity of neural responses to speech.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC7612903</pmcid><funding_grant_id>200942/Z/16/Z</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>200942</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Lam CC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sabesan S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lesica NA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Armstrong AG</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Compression and amplification algorithms in hearing aids impair the selectivity of neural responses to speech.</name><description>In quiet environments, hearing aids improve the perception of low-intensity sounds. However, for high-intensity sounds in background noise, the aids often fail to provide a benefit to the wearer. Here, using large-scale single-neuron recordings from hearing-impaired gerbils-an established animal model of human hearing-we show that hearing aids restore the sensitivity of neural responses to speech, but not their selectivity. Rather than reflecting a deficit in supra-threshold auditory processing, the low selectivity is a consequence of hearing-aid compression (which decreases the spectral and temporal contrasts of incoming sound) and amplification (which distorts neural responses, regardless of whether hearing is impaired). Processing strategies that avoid the trade-off between neural sensitivity and selectivity should improve the performance of hearing aids.</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Jun</publication><modification>2026-06-02T21:51:36.666Z</modification><creation>2025-02-18T23:36:17.167Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC7612903</accession><cross_references><pubmed>33941898</pubmed><doi>10.1038/s41551-021-00707-y</doi></cross_references></HashMap>