<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>DiStefano MT</submitter><funding>British Heart Foundation</funding><funding>Medical Research Council</funding><funding>NHGRI</funding><funding>NHGRI NIH HHS</funding><funding>NHMRC</funding><funding>Wellcome Trust</funding><pagination>1732-1742</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC7613247</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>24(8)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>Several groups and resources provide information that pertains to the validity of gene-disease relationships used in genomic medicine and research; however, universal standards and terminologies to define the evidence base for the role of a gene in disease and a single harmonized resource were lacking. To tackle this issue, the Gene Curation Coalition (GenCC) was formed.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>The GenCC drafted harmonized definitions for differing levels of gene-disease validity on the basis of existing resources, and performed a modified Delphi survey with 3 rounds to narrow the list of terms. The GenCC also developed a unified database to display curated gene-disease validity assertions from its members.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>On the basis of 241 survey responses from the genetics commun</pubmed_abstract><journal>Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics</journal><pubmed_title>The Gene Curation Coalition: A global effort to harmonize gene-disease evidence resources.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC7613247</pmcid><funding_grant_id>MC_UP_1102/20</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>208349/Z/17/Z</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U24 HG003345</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>200990/A/16/Z</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>107469/Z/15/Z</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>RE/18/4/34215</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>WT200990/Z/16/Z</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>208349</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U24 HG006834</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Roberts AM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Goehringer S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Amin M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Riggs ER</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Weller P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>DiStefano MT</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tahiliani J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bocchini C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cunningham F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ramos EM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Williams E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rehm HL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Goldstein J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Daugherty LC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bruford EA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Stark Z</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tweedie S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hamosh A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Olry A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Martin CL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Coffey AJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ware JS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rodwell C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wright CF</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fitzpatrick DR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Leong IUS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rath A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Austin-Tse C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Puzriakova A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Einhorn Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Snow C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Balzotti M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yates TM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Maddirevula S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Foulger RE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Amberger J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hurles MR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Babb L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Firth HV</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Alkuraya FS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Radtke K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Leigh SE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Collins H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Berg JS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>McDonagh EM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Birney E</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>The Gene Curation Coalition: A global effort to harmonize gene-disease evidence resources.</name><description>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>Several groups and resources provide information that pertains to the validity of gene-disease relationships used in genomic medicine and research; however, universal standards and terminologies to define the evidence base for the role of a gene in disease and a single harmonized resource were lacking. To tackle this issue, the Gene Curation Coalition (GenCC) was formed.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>The GenCC drafted harmonized definitions for differing levels of gene-disease validity on the basis of existing resources, and performed a modified Delphi survey with 3 rounds to narrow the list of terms. The GenCC also developed a unified database to display curated gene-disease validity assertions from its members.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>On the basis of 241 survey responses from the genetics commun</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Aug</publication><modification>2025-04-04T02:26:06.032Z</modification><creation>2025-02-19T02:26:28.096Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC7613247</accession><cross_references><pubmed>35507016</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.gim.2022.04.017</doi></cross_references></HashMap>