<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Ejo M</submitter><funding>Medical Research Council</funding><pagination>839-845</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC7614701</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>25(10)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;b>OBJECTIVES:&lt;/b> To assess the performance of the GenoType MTBDR&lt;i>sl&lt;/i> v1, a line-probe assay (LPA), to exclude baseline resistance to fluoroquinolones (FQs) and second-line injectables (SLIs) in the Standard Treatment Regimen of Anti-tuberculosis Drugs for Patients With MDR-TB 1 (STREAM 1) trial.&lt;b>METHODS:&lt;/b> Direct sputum MTBDR&lt;i>sl&lt;/i> results in the site laboratories were compared to indirect phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (pDST) results in the central laboratory, with DNA sequencing as a reference standard.&lt;b>RESULTS:&lt;/b> Of 413 multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) patients tested using MTBDR&lt;i>sl&lt;/i> and pDST, 389 (94.2%) were FQ-susceptible and 7 (1.7%) FQ-resistant, while 17 (4.1%) had an inconclusive MTBDR&lt;i>sl&lt;/i> result. For SLI, 372 (90.1%) were susceptible, 5 (1.2%) </pubmed_abstract><journal>The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease</journal><pubmed_title>Effectiveness of GenoType MTBDR&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;sl&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; in excluding TB drug resistance in a clinical trial.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC7614701</pmcid><funding_grant_id>MC_EX_MR/J012513/1</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>MC_UU_00004/04</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>MR/J012513/1</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>MC_UU_12023/26</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Diro E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Meredith S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ahmed S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ejo M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kokebu D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Keysers J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tumenbayar O</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Duckworth L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ngubane N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Conradie F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mulders W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>De Rijk P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hang PT</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Enduwamahoro E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dat PT</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mebrahtu T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Moodliar R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Van Deun A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tsogt B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Torrea G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>de Jong BC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ha DTM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nunn A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dalai D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rigouts L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Teferi M</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Effectiveness of GenoType MTBDR&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;sl&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; in excluding TB drug resistance in a clinical trial.</name><description>&lt;b>OBJECTIVES:&lt;/b> To assess the performance of the GenoType MTBDR&lt;i>sl&lt;/i> v1, a line-probe assay (LPA), to exclude baseline resistance to fluoroquinolones (FQs) and second-line injectables (SLIs) in the Standard Treatment Regimen of Anti-tuberculosis Drugs for Patients With MDR-TB 1 (STREAM 1) trial.&lt;b>METHODS:&lt;/b> Direct sputum MTBDR&lt;i>sl&lt;/i> results in the site laboratories were compared to indirect phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (pDST) results in the central laboratory, with DNA sequencing as a reference standard.&lt;b>RESULTS:&lt;/b> Of 413 multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) patients tested using MTBDR&lt;i>sl&lt;/i> and pDST, 389 (94.2%) were FQ-susceptible and 7 (1.7%) FQ-resistant, while 17 (4.1%) had an inconclusive MTBDR&lt;i>sl&lt;/i> result. For SLI, 372 (90.1%) were susceptible, 5 (1.2%) </description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021 Oct</publication><modification>2026-05-29T06:02:57.998Z</modification><creation>2024-11-05T20:26:02.788Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC7614701</accession><cross_references><pubmed>34615581</pubmed><doi>10.5588/ijtld.21.0212</doi></cross_references></HashMap>