{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"submitter":["Holford D"],"funding":["European Research Council"],"pagination":["539-554"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC7615322"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["45(4)"],"pubmed_abstract":["Effective science communication is challenging when scientific messages are informed by a continually updating evidence base and must often compete against misinformation. We argue that we need a new program of science communication as collective intelligence-a collaborative approach, supported by technology. This would have four key advantages over the typical model where scientists communicate as individuals: scientific messages would be informed by (a) a wider base of aggregated knowledge, (b) contributions from a diverse scientific community, (c) participatory input from stakeholders, and (d) better responsiveness to ongoing changes in the state of knowledge."],"journal":["Science communication"],"pubmed_title":["Science Communication as a Collective Intelligence Endeavor: A Manifesto and Examples for Implementation."],"pmcid":["PMC7615322"],"funding_grant_id":["101020961"],"pubmed_authors":["Alladin S","Fasce A","Sirota M","Nurse MS","Herzog SM","Lehmann S","Hanel PHP","Demko M","Abels CM","Sah S","Lewandowsky S","Sonia Boender T","Al-Rawi A","Holford D","Gilde C","Kause A","Hahn U","Tapper K","Schmid P","Bruns H","Orr C","Pescetelli N","Fischer H","Wulf M","Petrescu M"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Science Communication as a Collective Intelligence Endeavor: A Manifesto and Examples for Implementation.","description":"Effective science communication is challenging when scientific messages are informed by a continually updating evidence base and must often compete against misinformation. We argue that we need a new program of science communication as collective intelligence-a collaborative approach, supported by technology. This would have four key advantages over the typical model where scientists communicate as individuals: scientific messages would be informed by (a) a wider base of aggregated knowledge, (b) contributions from a diverse scientific community, (c) participatory input from stakeholders, and (d) better responsiveness to ongoing changes in the state of knowledge.","dates":{"release":"2023-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2023 Aug","modification":"2025-04-18T21:53:27.73Z","creation":"2025-04-07T09:40:55.955Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC7615322","cross_references":{"pubmed":["37994373"],"doi":["10.1177/10755470231162634"]}}