<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Nkumama IN</submitter><funding>EPA</funding><funding>National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)</funding><funding>Wellcome Trust</funding><pagination>1215-1224.e6</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC7616646</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>57(6)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Malaria is a life-threatening disease of global health importance, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa. The growth inhibition assay (GIA) is routinely used to evaluate, prioritize, and quantify the efficacy of malaria blood-stage vaccine candidates but does not reliably predict either naturally acquired or vaccine-induced protection. Controlled human malaria challenge studies in semi-immune volunteers provide an unparalleled opportunity to robustly identify mechanistic correlates of protection. We leveraged this platform to undertake a head-to-head comparison of seven functional antibody assays that are relevant to immunity against the erythrocytic merozoite stage of Plasmodium falciparum. Fc-mediated effector functions were strongly associated with protection from clinical symptoms of malaria and exponential parasite multiplication, while the gold standard GIA was not. The breadth of Fc-mediated effector function discriminated clinical immunity following the challenge. These findings present a shift in the understanding of the mechanisms that underpin immunity to malaria and have important implications for vaccine development.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Immunity</journal><pubmed_title>Breadth of Fc-mediated effector function correlates with clinical immunity following human malaria challenge.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC7616646</pmcid><funding_grant_id>107499/Z/15/Z</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>226669/Z/22/Z</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>EP-C-15-003</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>107499</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>16/136/33</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>107769/Z/10/Z</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Mwai K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>CHMI-SIKA study team</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Frank R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rosenkranz M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Musasia F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tuju J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Osier FHA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Furle K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ogwang R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kapulu MC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Odera D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nyamako L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nkumama IN</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Murungi L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Njuguna P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kimathi R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hamaluba M</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Breadth of Fc-mediated effector function correlates with clinical immunity following human malaria challenge.</name><description>Malaria is a life-threatening disease of global health importance, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa. The growth inhibition assay (GIA) is routinely used to evaluate, prioritize, and quantify the efficacy of malaria blood-stage vaccine candidates but does not reliably predict either naturally acquired or vaccine-induced protection. Controlled human malaria challenge studies in semi-immune volunteers provide an unparalleled opportunity to robustly identify mechanistic correlates of protection. We leveraged this platform to undertake a head-to-head comparison of seven functional antibody assays that are relevant to immunity against the erythrocytic merozoite stage of Plasmodium falciparum. Fc-mediated effector functions were strongly associated with protection from clinical symptoms of malaria and exponential parasite multiplication, while the gold standard GIA was not. The breadth of Fc-mediated effector function discriminated clinical immunity following the challenge. These findings present a shift in the understanding of the mechanisms that underpin immunity to malaria and have important implications for vaccine development.</description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Jun</publication><modification>2026-06-03T05:27:32.353Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T08:23:14.308Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC7616646</accession><cross_references><pubmed>38788711</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.immuni.2024.05.001</doi></cross_references></HashMap>