biostudies-literatureNi Chobhthaigh SMedical Research CouncilNIHR Great Ormond Street Hospital Biomedical Research Centre63-71https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC7617073biostudies-literatureUnknown226(2)<h4>Background</h4>Minoritised young people face a double burden of discrimination through increased risk of stress and differential treatment access. However, acute care pathways for minoritised young people with urgent mental health needs are poorly understood.<h4>Aims</h4>To explore variation in stress-related presentations (SRPs) to acute hospitals across racial-ethnic groups in England.<h4>Method</h4>We examined rates, distribution, duration and types of SRPs across racial-ethnic groups in a retrospective cohort of 11- to 15-year-olds with one or more emergency hospital admissions between April 2014 and March 2020. SRPs were defined as emergency admissions for potentially psychosomatic symptoms, self-harm and internalising, externalising and thought disorders.<h4>Results</h4>White British (8-38 per 1000 births) and Mixed White-Black (9-42 per 1000 births) young people had highest rates of SRPs, whereas Black African (5-14 per 1000 births), Indian (6-19 per 1000 births) and White other (4-19 per 1000 births) young people had the lowest rates of SRPs. The proportion of readmissions were highest for Pakistani (47.7%), White British (41.4%) and Mixed White-Black (41.3%) groups. Black Other (36.4%) and White Other (35.8%) groups had the lowest proportions of readmissions. The proportion of admission durations ≥3 days was higher for Black Other (16.6%), Bangladeshi (16.3%), Asian Other (15.9%) and Black Caribbean (15.8%) groups than their White British (11.9%) and Indian (11.8%) peers. The type of SRPs varied across racial-ethnic groups.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Patterns of SRP admissions systematically differed across racial-ethnic groups, indicative of inequitable triage, assessment and treatment processes. These findings highlight the need for implementation of race equality frameworks to address structural racism in healthcare pathways.The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental scienceEmergency hospital admissions for stress-related presentations among secondary school-aged minoritised young people in England.PMC7617073MR/S003797/1MR/N013867/1Blackburn RJay MANi Chobhthaigh SfalseEmergency hospital admissions for stress-related presentations among secondary school-aged minoritised young people in England.<h4>Background</h4>Minoritised young people face a double burden of discrimination through increased risk of stress and differential treatment access. However, acute care pathways for minoritised young people with urgent mental health needs are poorly understood.<h4>Aims</h4>To explore variation in stress-related presentations (SRPs) to acute hospitals across racial-ethnic groups in England.<h4>Method</h4>We examined rates, distribution, duration and types of SRPs across racial-ethnic groups in a retrospective cohort of 11- to 15-year-olds with one or more emergency hospital admissions between April 2014 and March 2020. SRPs were defined as emergency admissions for potentially psychosomatic symptoms, self-harm and internalising, externalising and thought disorders.<h4>Results</h4>White British (8-38 per 1000 births) and Mixed White-Black (9-42 per 1000 births) young people had highest rates of SRPs, whereas Black African (5-14 per 1000 births), Indian (6-19 per 1000 births) and White other (4-19 per 1000 births) young people had the lowest rates of SRPs. The proportion of readmissions were highest for Pakistani (47.7%), White British (41.4%) and Mixed White-Black (41.3%) groups. Black Other (36.4%) and White Other (35.8%) groups had the lowest proportions of readmissions. The proportion of admission durations ≥3 days was higher for Black Other (16.6%), Bangladeshi (16.3%), Asian Other (15.9%) and Black Caribbean (15.8%) groups than their White British (11.9%) and Indian (11.8%) peers. The type of SRPs varied across racial-ethnic groups.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Patterns of SRP admissions systematically differed across racial-ethnic groups, indicative of inequitable triage, assessment and treatment processes. These findings highlight the need for implementation of race equality frameworks to address structural racism in healthcare pathways.2025-01-01T00:00:00Z2025 Feb2025-07-07T03:09:02.944Z2025-04-06T01:58:33.203ZS-EPMC76170733952321410.1192/bjp.2024.123