<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Sun G</submitter><funding>Cancer Research UK</funding><funding>Medical Research Council</funding><funding>Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation Programme</funding><funding>National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)</funding><funding>National Institute for Health and Care Research</funding><pagination>549-558</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC7617434</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>155(2)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>The seAFOod randomized controlled trial tested colorectal polyp prevention by the omega-3 (ω-3) highly unsaturated fatty acid (HUFA) eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and aspirin. Variable dietary intake of omega-3 HUFAs (also including docosahexaenoic acid [DHA]) and differential EPA capsule compliance could confound analysis of trial outcomes.&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between total (diet and capsule) daily omega-3 HUFA intake, red blood cell (RBC), and rectal mucosa omega-3 HUFA concentrations, and colorectal polyp outcomes in a secondary analysis of the seAFOod trial.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Individual-participant dietary omega-3 HUFA intake (mg/d) was derived from food frequency questionnaires using the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition-Norfolk fatty acid nutrient database. Capsule EPA intake (mg/d) was adjusted for compliance (capsule counting). Fatty acids were analyzed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (as % of total fatty acids). HUFA oxidation was measured using the HUFA/saturated fatty acid (SAT) ratio. The colorectal polyp detection rate (PDR; % with ≥1 polyps) and polyp number per participant were analyzed according to the change in RBC EPA concentrations during the trial (ΔEPA), irrespective of treatment allocation.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>There was a small degree of HUFA degradation over time in RBC samples stored at > -80&lt;sup>o&lt;/sup>C at research sites (r = -0.36, P&lt;0.001 for HUFA/SAT ratio over time), which did not affect analysis of omega-3 HUFA concentrations. Low baseline EPA concentration, as well as allocation to EPA and % compliance, were associated with a high ΔEPA. Individuals with a ΔEPA value >+0.5% points (ΔEPA&lt;sub>high&lt;/sub>), irrespective of allocation to EPA or placebo, had a lower PDR than ΔEPA&lt;sub>low&lt;/sub> individuals (odds ratio: 0.63; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.40, 1.01) and reduced colorectal polyp number (incidence rate ratio: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.54, 1.02).&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Analysis of the seAFOod trial according to the change in EPA concentration, instead of treatment allocation, revealed a protective effect of EPA treatment on colorectal polyp recurrence (ISRCTN05926847).</pubmed_abstract><journal>The Journal of nutrition</journal><pubmed_title>The Relationship Between Dietary and Supplemental omega-3 Highly Unsaturated Fatty Acid Intake, Blood and Tissue omega-3 Highly Unsaturated Fatty Acid Concentrations, and Colorectal Polyp Recurrence: A Secondary Analysis of the seAFOod Polyp Prevention Trial.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC7617434</pmcid><funding_grant_id>NIHR128210</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>C23434/A24939</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>MC_UU_00004/01</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>MC_UU_00004/02</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Williams EA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Race AD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Downing A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rees CJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sun G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fuller H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Brown LC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hull MA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Loadman PM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fenton H</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>The Relationship Between Dietary and Supplemental omega-3 Highly Unsaturated Fatty Acid Intake, Blood and Tissue omega-3 Highly Unsaturated Fatty Acid Concentrations, and Colorectal Polyp Recurrence: A Secondary Analysis of the seAFOod Polyp Prevention Trial.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>The seAFOod randomized controlled trial tested colorectal polyp prevention by the omega-3 (ω-3) highly unsaturated fatty acid (HUFA) eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and aspirin. Variable dietary intake of omega-3 HUFAs (also including docosahexaenoic acid [DHA]) and differential EPA capsule compliance could confound analysis of trial outcomes.&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between total (diet and capsule) daily omega-3 HUFA intake, red blood cell (RBC), and rectal mucosa omega-3 HUFA concentrations, and colorectal polyp outcomes in a secondary analysis of the seAFOod trial.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Individual-participant dietary omega-3 HUFA intake (mg/d) was derived from food frequency questionnaires using the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition-Norfolk fatty acid nutrient database. Capsule EPA intake (mg/d) was adjusted for compliance (capsule counting). Fatty acids were analyzed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (as % of total fatty acids). HUFA oxidation was measured using the HUFA/saturated fatty acid (SAT) ratio. The colorectal polyp detection rate (PDR; % with ≥1 polyps) and polyp number per participant were analyzed according to the change in RBC EPA concentrations during the trial (ΔEPA), irrespective of treatment allocation.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>There was a small degree of HUFA degradation over time in RBC samples stored at > -80&lt;sup>o&lt;/sup>C at research sites (r = -0.36, P&lt;0.001 for HUFA/SAT ratio over time), which did not affect analysis of omega-3 HUFA concentrations. Low baseline EPA concentration, as well as allocation to EPA and % compliance, were associated with a high ΔEPA. Individuals with a ΔEPA value >+0.5% points (ΔEPA&lt;sub>high&lt;/sub>), irrespective of allocation to EPA or placebo, had a lower PDR than ΔEPA&lt;sub>low&lt;/sub> individuals (odds ratio: 0.63; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.40, 1.01) and reduced colorectal polyp number (incidence rate ratio: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.54, 1.02).&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Analysis of the seAFOod trial according to the change in EPA concentration, instead of treatment allocation, revealed a protective effect of EPA treatment on colorectal polyp recurrence (ISRCTN05926847).</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Feb</publication><modification>2025-04-18T17:29:10.968Z</modification><creation>2025-04-07T05:00:24.92Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC7617434</accession><cross_references><pubmed>39675479</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.tjnut.2024.12.004</doi></cross_references></HashMap>