<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Nazarzadeh M</submitter><funding>World Health Organization</funding><funding>British Heart Foundation</funding><funding>Boehringer Ingelheim</funding><funding>Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, University of Wisconsin, Madison</funding><funding>National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute</funding><funding>Baylor College of Medicine</funding><pagination>609-623</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC7618006</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>7(5)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Pharmacologic blood pressure (BP) lowering is typically a lifelong treatment, and both clinicians and patients may have concerns about the long-term use of antihypertensive agents and the risk for cancer. However, evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) regarding the effect of long-term pharmacologic BP lowering on the risk for new-onset cancer is limited, with most knowledge derived from observational studies.&lt;h4>Objectives&lt;/h4>The aim of this study was to assess whether long-term BP lowering affects the risk for new-onset cancer, cause-specific cancer death, and selected site-specific cancers.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Individual-level data from 42 RCTs were pooled using a one-stage individual participant data meta-analysis. The primary outcome was incident cancer of all types, and secondary outcomes were cause-specific cancer death and selected site-specific cancers. Prespecified subgroup analyses were conducted to assess the heterogeneity of the BP-lowering effect by baseline variables and over follow-up time. Cox proportional hazards regression, stratified by trial, was used for the statistical analysis. For site-specific cancers, analyses were complemented with Mendelian randomization, using naturally randomized genetic variants associated with BP lowering to mimic the design of a long-term RCT.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Data from 314,016 randomly allocated participants without known cancer at baseline were analyzed. Over a median follow-up of 4 years (Q1-Q3: 3-5 years), 17,954 participants (5.7%) developed cancer, and 4,878 (1.5%) died of cancer. In the individual participant data meta-analysis, no associations were found between reductions in systolic or diastolic BP and cancer risk (HR per 5 mm Hg reduction in systolic BP: 1.03 [95% CI: 0.99-1.06]; HR per 3 mm Hg reduction in diastolic BP: 1.03 [95% CI: 0.98-1.07]). No changes in relative risk for incident cancer were observed over follow-up time, nor was there evidence of heterogeneity in treatment effects across baseline subgroups. No effect on cause-specific cancer death was found. For site-specific cancers, no evidence of an effect was observed, except a possible link with lung cancer risk (HR for systolic BP reduction: 1.17; 99.5% CI: 1.02-1.32). Mendelian randomization studies showed no association between systolic or diastolic BP reduction and site-specific cancers, including overall lung cancer and its subtypes.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Randomized data analysis provided no evidence to indicate that pharmacologic BP lowering has a substantial impact, either increasing or decreasing, on the risk for incident cancer, cause-specific cancer death, or selected site-specific cancers.</pubmed_abstract><journal>JACC. CardioOncology</journal><pubmed_title>Blood Pressure Lowering and Risk of Cancer: Individual Participant-Level Data Meta-Analysis and Mendelian Randomization Studies.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC7618006</pmcid><funding_grant_id>001</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>FS/IPBSRF/22/27060</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>PG/18/65/33872</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Kjeldsen SE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bidel Z</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Woodward M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>McKay J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Davis BR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sundstrom J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chalmers J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Copland E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Malarstig A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Smith Byrne K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Canoy D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rahimi K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists’ Collaboration</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hedman AK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yang Q</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Teo KK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nazarzadeh M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pepine CJ</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Blood Pressure Lowering and Risk of Cancer: Individual Participant-Level Data Meta-Analysis and Mendelian Randomization Studies.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Pharmacologic blood pressure (BP) lowering is typically a lifelong treatment, and both clinicians and patients may have concerns about the long-term use of antihypertensive agents and the risk for cancer. However, evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) regarding the effect of long-term pharmacologic BP lowering on the risk for new-onset cancer is limited, with most knowledge derived from observational studies.&lt;h4>Objectives&lt;/h4>The aim of this study was to assess whether long-term BP lowering affects the risk for new-onset cancer, cause-specific cancer death, and selected site-specific cancers.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Individual-level data from 42 RCTs were pooled using a one-stage individual participant data meta-analysis. The primary outcome was incident cancer of all types, and secondary outcomes were cause-specific cancer death and selected site-specific cancers. Prespecified subgroup analyses were conducted to assess the heterogeneity of the BP-lowering effect by baseline variables and over follow-up time. Cox proportional hazards regression, stratified by trial, was used for the statistical analysis. For site-specific cancers, analyses were complemented with Mendelian randomization, using naturally randomized genetic variants associated with BP lowering to mimic the design of a long-term RCT.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Data from 314,016 randomly allocated participants without known cancer at baseline were analyzed. Over a median follow-up of 4 years (Q1-Q3: 3-5 years), 17,954 participants (5.7%) developed cancer, and 4,878 (1.5%) died of cancer. In the individual participant data meta-analysis, no associations were found between reductions in systolic or diastolic BP and cancer risk (HR per 5 mm Hg reduction in systolic BP: 1.03 [95% CI: 0.99-1.06]; HR per 3 mm Hg reduction in diastolic BP: 1.03 [95% CI: 0.98-1.07]). No changes in relative risk for incident cancer were observed over follow-up time, nor was there evidence of heterogeneity in treatment effects across baseline subgroups. No effect on cause-specific cancer death was found. For site-specific cancers, no evidence of an effect was observed, except a possible link with lung cancer risk (HR for systolic BP reduction: 1.17; 99.5% CI: 1.02-1.32). Mendelian randomization studies showed no association between systolic or diastolic BP reduction and site-specific cancers, including overall lung cancer and its subtypes.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Randomized data analysis provided no evidence to indicate that pharmacologic BP lowering has a substantial impact, either increasing or decreasing, on the risk for incident cancer, cause-specific cancer death, or selected site-specific cancers.</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Aug</publication><modification>2026-06-02T08:48:58.537Z</modification><creation>2026-04-16T03:12:49.645Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC7618006</accession><cross_references><pubmed>40366326</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.jaccao.2025.03.005</doi></cross_references></HashMap>