<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Tyson MD</submitter><funding>AHRQ HHS</funding><funding>NCI NIH HHS</funding><pagination>26-33</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC7643873</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>74(1)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Whether prostate cancer severity modifies patient-reported functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP) or external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for localized cancer is unknown.&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>The purpose of this study was to determine whether differences in predicted function over time between RP and EBRT varied by risk group.&lt;h4>Design, setting, and participants&lt;/h4>The Comparative Effectiveness Analysis of Surgery and Radiation (CEASAR) study is a prospective, population-based, observational study that enrolled men with localized prostate cancer in 2011-2012. Among 2117 CEASAR participants who underwent RP or EBRT, 817 had low-risk, 902 intermediate-risk, and 398 high-risk disease.&lt;h4>Outcome measurements and statistical analysis&lt;/h4>Patient-reported, disease-sp</pubmed_abstract><journal>European urology</journal><pubmed_title>Effect of Prostate Cancer Severity on Functional Outcomes After Localized Treatment: Comparative Effectiveness Analysis of Surgery and Radiation Study Results.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC7643873</pmcid><funding_grant_id>R01 HS019356</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 HS022640</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>T32 CA106183</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Hashibe M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Koyama T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Conwill R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cooperberg MR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Paddock LE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Goodman M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tyson MD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Greenfield S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lee D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hamilton AS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Resnick MJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wu XC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Stroup A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hoffman KE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Barocas DA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chen V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>McCollum D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Penson DF</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Effect of Prostate Cancer Severity on Functional Outcomes After Localized Treatment: Comparative Effectiveness Analysis of Surgery and Radiation Study Results.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Whether prostate cancer severity modifies patient-reported functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP) or external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for localized cancer is unknown.&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>The purpose of this study was to determine whether differences in predicted function over time between RP and EBRT varied by risk group.&lt;h4>Design, setting, and participants&lt;/h4>The Comparative Effectiveness Analysis of Surgery and Radiation (CEASAR) study is a prospective, population-based, observational study that enrolled men with localized prostate cancer in 2011-2012. Among 2117 CEASAR participants who underwent RP or EBRT, 817 had low-risk, 902 intermediate-risk, and 398 high-risk disease.&lt;h4>Outcome measurements and statistical analysis&lt;/h4>Patient-reported, disease-sp</description><dates><release>2018-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2018 Jul</publication><modification>2025-04-04T01:37:17.394Z</modification><creation>2020-11-08T09:44:52Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC7643873</accession><cross_references><pubmed>29501451</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.eururo.2018.02.012</doi></cross_references></HashMap>