<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>28</volume><submitter>Coudert B</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>The open-label, randomised Phase 2 AVATAXHER study (NCT01142778) demonstrated that early PET assessment identified HER2-positive breast cancer patients who responded poorly to neoadjuvant docetaxel plus trastuzumab. Adding neoadjuvant bevacizumab for PET-predicted poor-responders improved pathological complete response (pCR) rates (43.8% vs 24.0%). We investigated long-term study outcomes.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Patients were treated in three groups. All patients initially received two cycles of standard neoadjuvant therapy with [¹⁸F]-FDG PET conducted before each cycle. Those with ≥70% change in the maximum standardised uptake value (∆SUVmax) received four further cycles of standard neoadjuvant therapy (PET responders). PET-predicted poor-responders (∆SUVmax &lt;70%) were randomis</pubmed_abstract><journal>EClinicalMedicine</journal><pagination>100566</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC7649610</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Long-term outcomes in patients with PET-predicted poor-responsive HER2-positive breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant bevacizumab added to trastuzumab and docetaxel: 5-year follow-up of the randomised Avataxher study.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC7649610</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Coudert B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dupin J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Du FL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chauvet MP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Arnould L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Coeffic D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Berriolo-Riedinger A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Barbe C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Prevost JB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ferrero JM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Paintaud G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gabelle P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dupre PF</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kerrou K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pierga JY</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mouret-Reynier MA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bachelot T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Thibault G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Petit T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ferhat A</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Long-term outcomes in patients with PET-predicted poor-responsive HER2-positive breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant bevacizumab added to trastuzumab and docetaxel: 5-year follow-up of the randomised Avataxher study.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>The open-label, randomised Phase 2 AVATAXHER study (NCT01142778) demonstrated that early PET assessment identified HER2-positive breast cancer patients who responded poorly to neoadjuvant docetaxel plus trastuzumab. Adding neoadjuvant bevacizumab for PET-predicted poor-responders improved pathological complete response (pCR) rates (43.8% vs 24.0%). We investigated long-term study outcomes.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Patients were treated in three groups. All patients initially received two cycles of standard neoadjuvant therapy with [¹⁸F]-FDG PET conducted before each cycle. Those with ≥70% change in the maximum standardised uptake value (∆SUVmax) received four further cycles of standard neoadjuvant therapy (PET responders). PET-predicted poor-responders (∆SUVmax &lt;70%) were randomis</description><dates><release>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2020 Nov</publication><modification>2026-05-04T03:45:58.24Z</modification><creation>2020-11-22T09:48:06Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC7649610</accession><cross_references><pubmed>33205032</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100566</doi></cross_references></HashMap>