{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["9(5)"],"submitter":["Wang Y"],"pubmed_abstract":["<h4>Background</h4>Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the primary method for the treatment of renal calculi. The preservation of the nephrostomy tube after operation brings severe pain to the patients. We use a 1,470 nm semiconductor laser to stop bleeding after the operation, which cannot reserve the nephrostomy tube, fully reflect its safety and effectiveness, and provide a new method for clinical practice.<h4>Methods</h4>Forty-two patients with renal stones who came to our hospital from March 2016 to September 2019 were randomly divided into two groups: laser operation group (20 patients) and traditional operation group (22 patients). The stone removal rate, surgical effect, and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.<h4>Results</h4>There was no significant difference in the stone clearance rate between the two groups at the 4th week after operation (P>0.05). However, the incidence of postoperative infection, incision pain, and massive bleeding in the laser surgery group were lower than those in the traditional surgery group (P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference in urine extravasation and postoperative hematuria between the two groups (P>0.05). The average postoperative hospital stay in the laser surgery group was shorter than that in the traditional surgery group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Simultaneously, there was no significant difference in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and medical expenses between the two groups (P>0.05).<h4>Conclusions</h4>The 1,470 nm laser is safe, effective, and feasible in PCNL operation, especially in hemostasis of the renal puncture channel, and it is worth popularizing."],"journal":["Translational andrology and urology"],"pagination":["2172-2178"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC7658143"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"pubmed_title":["The clinical research of 1,470 nm laser in percutaneous nephrolithotomy."],"pmcid":["PMC7658143"],"pubmed_authors":["Hu H","Wang Y","Tang X"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"The clinical research of 1,470 nm laser in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.","description":"<h4>Background</h4>Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the primary method for the treatment of renal calculi. The preservation of the nephrostomy tube after operation brings severe pain to the patients. We use a 1,470 nm semiconductor laser to stop bleeding after the operation, which cannot reserve the nephrostomy tube, fully reflect its safety and effectiveness, and provide a new method for clinical practice.<h4>Methods</h4>Forty-two patients with renal stones who came to our hospital from March 2016 to September 2019 were randomly divided into two groups: laser operation group (20 patients) and traditional operation group (22 patients). The stone removal rate, surgical effect, and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.<h4>Results</h4>There was no significant difference in the stone clearance rate between the two groups at the 4th week after operation (P>0.05). However, the incidence of postoperative infection, incision pain, and massive bleeding in the laser surgery group were lower than those in the traditional surgery group (P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference in urine extravasation and postoperative hematuria between the two groups (P>0.05). The average postoperative hospital stay in the laser surgery group was shorter than that in the traditional surgery group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Simultaneously, there was no significant difference in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and medical expenses between the two groups (P>0.05).<h4>Conclusions</h4>The 1,470 nm laser is safe, effective, and feasible in PCNL operation, especially in hemostasis of the renal puncture channel, and it is worth popularizing.","dates":{"release":"2020-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2020 Oct","modification":"2025-04-19T23:39:51.619Z","creation":"2025-04-19T23:39:51.619Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC7658143","cross_references":{"pubmed":["33209681"],"doi":["10.21037/tau-20-1224"]}}