<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>37(5)</volume><submitter>Bobrowska-Korzeniowska M</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>The usefulness of total specific resistance (sRtot) and interrupter resistance (Rint) as a bronchodilator reversibility test (BT) alternative to forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV&lt;sub>1&lt;/sub>) in asthma diagnosis in children has not been established.&lt;h4>Aim&lt;/h4>To compare different applied definitions of airflow obstruction in children measuring response to the bronchodilator by spirometry, plethysmography and the interrupter technique in asthmatic children.&lt;h4>Material and methods&lt;/h4>It was a prospective, real-life, non-interventional study. Children, aged 6-18 with newly diagnosed asthma, able to perform lung function tests were included into the study. Subjects underwent a history taking, physical examination, reversibility test in spirometry, plethysmography, an</pubmed_abstract><journal>Postepy dermatologii i alergologii</journal><pagination>685-689</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC7675071</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Usefulness of sRtot and Rint in bronchodilator testing in the diagnosis of asthma in children.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC7675071</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Jerzynska J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bobrowska-Korzeniowska M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Stelmach I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Brzozowska A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Stelmach W</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Usefulness of sRtot and Rint in bronchodilator testing in the diagnosis of asthma in children.</name><description>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>The usefulness of total specific resistance (sRtot) and interrupter resistance (Rint) as a bronchodilator reversibility test (BT) alternative to forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV&lt;sub>1&lt;/sub>) in asthma diagnosis in children has not been established.&lt;h4>Aim&lt;/h4>To compare different applied definitions of airflow obstruction in children measuring response to the bronchodilator by spirometry, plethysmography and the interrupter technique in asthmatic children.&lt;h4>Material and methods&lt;/h4>It was a prospective, real-life, non-interventional study. Children, aged 6-18 with newly diagnosed asthma, able to perform lung function tests were included into the study. Subjects underwent a history taking, physical examination, reversibility test in spirometry, plethysmography, an</description><dates><release>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2020 Oct</publication><modification>2025-04-04T10:55:07.745Z</modification><creation>2021-02-20T00:54:25Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC7675071</accession><cross_references><pubmed>33240006</pubmed><doi>10.5114/ada.2019.85631</doi></cross_references></HashMap>