<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores><citationCount>0</citationCount><reanalysisCount>0</reanalysisCount><viewCount>42</viewCount><searchCount>0</searchCount></scores><additional><submitter>Moser O</submitter><funding>Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation United States of America</funding><funding>Horizon 2020 Framework Programme</funding><funding>Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking</funding><funding>Horizon 2020</funding><funding>American Diabetes Association</funding><funding>Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation</funding><funding>IDF</funding><pagination>2153-2159</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC7689757</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>37(12)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Aims&lt;/h4>Considering that people with type 1 diabetes and impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia (IAH) have a delayed perception of hypoglycaemia, the question arises whether they perform scans later in case of hypoglycaemia than people without IAH. We assessed whether time to performing a scan after reaching hypoglycaemia while using a flash glucose monitoring (flash GM) system is different in people with IAH compared with people without IAH.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Ninety-two people with type 1 diabetes [mean (± sd) age 42 ± 14 years, HbA&lt;sub>1c&lt;/sub> 57 ± 9 mmol/mol] using a flash GM system for 3 months were included. Flash GM data were assessed for time until scan after reaching hypoglycaemia level 1 (&lt; 3.9 mmol/l) and level 2 (&lt; 3.0 mmol/l) and compared for type 1 diabetes with vs. without IAH via unpaired t-test/Mann-Whitney U test (P &lt; 0.05).&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Significant differences were found only for the delay between reaching hypoglycaemia and scan between people with and without IAH for Gold score [hypoglycaemia level 1: IAH 78 (51-105) min vs. without IAH 63 (42-89) min, P = 0.03; night-time hypoglycaemia level 2: IAH 140 (107-227) min vs. without IAH 96 (41-155) min, P = 0.004] and Pedersen-Bjergaard score [hypoglycaemia level 1: IAH 76 (52-97) min vs. without IAH 54 (38-71) min, P = 0.011; night-time hypoglycaemia level 1: IAH 132 (79-209) min vs. without IAH 89 (59-143) min, P = 0.011; night-time hypoglycaemia level 2: IAH 134 (66-212) min vs. without IAH 80 (37-131) min, P = 0.002). Data are shown as median (i.q.r.).&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Time until scan after reaching hypoglycaemia might be an objective assessment tool for IAH, but needs to be investigated comprehensively in future studies.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association</journal><pubmed_title>People with type 1 diabetes and impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia have a delayed reaction to performing a glucose scan during hypoglycaemia: a prospective observational study.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC7689757</pmcid><funding_grant_id>777460</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Moser O</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Eckstein ML</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ziko H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pottler T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sourij H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hypo-RESOLVE Consortium</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Elsayed H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hochfellner DA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mueller A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mader JK</pubmed_authors><view_count>42</view_count></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>People with type 1 diabetes and impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia have a delayed reaction to performing a glucose scan during hypoglycaemia: a prospective observational study.</name><description>&lt;h4>Aims&lt;/h4>Considering that people with type 1 diabetes and impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia (IAH) have a delayed perception of hypoglycaemia, the question arises whether they perform scans later in case of hypoglycaemia than people without IAH. We assessed whether time to performing a scan after reaching hypoglycaemia while using a flash glucose monitoring (flash GM) system is different in people with IAH compared with people without IAH.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Ninety-two people with type 1 diabetes [mean (± sd) age 42 ± 14 years, HbA&lt;sub>1c&lt;/sub> 57 ± 9 mmol/mol] using a flash GM system for 3 months were included. Flash GM data were assessed for time until scan after reaching hypoglycaemia level 1 (&lt; 3.9 mmol/l) and level 2 (&lt; 3.0 mmol/l) and compared for type 1 diabetes with vs. without IAH via unpaired t-test/Mann-Whitney U test (P &lt; 0.05).&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Significant differences were found only for the delay between reaching hypoglycaemia and scan between people with and without IAH for Gold score [hypoglycaemia level 1: IAH 78 (51-105) min vs. without IAH 63 (42-89) min, P = 0.03; night-time hypoglycaemia level 2: IAH 140 (107-227) min vs. without IAH 96 (41-155) min, P = 0.004] and Pedersen-Bjergaard score [hypoglycaemia level 1: IAH 76 (52-97) min vs. without IAH 54 (38-71) min, P = 0.011; night-time hypoglycaemia level 1: IAH 132 (79-209) min vs. without IAH 89 (59-143) min, P = 0.011; night-time hypoglycaemia level 2: IAH 134 (66-212) min vs. without IAH 80 (37-131) min, P = 0.002). Data are shown as median (i.q.r.).&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Time until scan after reaching hypoglycaemia might be an objective assessment tool for IAH, but needs to be investigated comprehensively in future studies.</description><dates><release>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2020 Dec</publication><modification>2024-02-15T18:00:27.677Z</modification><creation>2021-02-20T02:55:59Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC7689757</accession><cross_references><pubmed>32638428</pubmed><doi>10.1111/dme.14362</doi></cross_references></HashMap>