<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Zhao J</submitter><funding>Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft</funding><funding>Modern Agriculture Industrial Technology System Special Project-the National Technology System for Conventional Freshwater Fish Industries</funding><funding>National Natural Science Foundation of China</funding><funding>Key Program of Science and Technology of Zhejiang Province</funding><pagination>20202172</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC7735268</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>287(1938)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Foraging animals must balance benefits of food acquisition with costs induced by a post-prandial reduction in performance. Eating to satiation can lead to a reduction in locomotor and escape performance, which increases risk should a threat subsequently arises, but limiting feeding behaviour may be maladaptive if food intake is unnecessarily reduced in the prediction of threats that do not arise. The efficacy of the trade-off between continued and interrupted feeding therefore relies on information about the future risk, which is imperfect. Here, we find that black carp (&lt;i>Mylopharyngodon piceus&lt;/i>) can balance this trade-off using an &lt;i>a posteriori&lt;/i> strategy; by eating to satiation but regurgitating already ingested food when a threat arises. While degrees of satiation (DS) equal to</pubmed_abstract><journal>Proceedings. Biological sciences</journal><pubmed_title>Solving post-prandial reduction in performance by adaptive regurgitation in a freshwater fish.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC7735268</pmcid><funding_grant_id>2019C02082</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>EXC 2117 – 422037984</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>31772900</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>31902359</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>CARS-45-26</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Wen Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhu J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jordan A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhao J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhu S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ye J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ye Z</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Solving post-prandial reduction in performance by adaptive regurgitation in a freshwater fish.</name><description>Foraging animals must balance benefits of food acquisition with costs induced by a post-prandial reduction in performance. Eating to satiation can lead to a reduction in locomotor and escape performance, which increases risk should a threat subsequently arises, but limiting feeding behaviour may be maladaptive if food intake is unnecessarily reduced in the prediction of threats that do not arise. The efficacy of the trade-off between continued and interrupted feeding therefore relies on information about the future risk, which is imperfect. Here, we find that black carp (&lt;i>Mylopharyngodon piceus&lt;/i>) can balance this trade-off using an &lt;i>a posteriori&lt;/i> strategy; by eating to satiation but regurgitating already ingested food when a threat arises. While degrees of satiation (DS) equal to</description><dates><release>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2020 Nov</publication><modification>2026-05-07T12:11:17.415Z</modification><creation>2022-02-11T12:39:54.626Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC7735268</accession><cross_references><pubmed>33171081</pubmed><doi>10.1098/rspb.2020.2172</doi></cross_references></HashMap>