<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><submitter>Lee DH</submitter><funding>NHLBI NIH HHS</funding><funding>NCI NIH HHS</funding><pubmed_abstract>The dietary insulin index directly estimates the postprandial insulin secretion potential of foods, whereas the empirical dietary index for hyperinsulinaemia (EDIH) assesses the insulinaemic potential of usual diets based on fasting plasma C-peptide, and is primarily reflective of insulin resistance. It is unknown whether these insulin-related indices are predictive of an integrated measure of insulin secretion. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis that included 293 non-diabetic men with 24-h urinary C-peptide data from the Men's Lifestyle Validation Study. EDIH, dietary insulin index and dietary insulin load were calculated using validated FFQ. We conducted multivariable-adjusted linear regression to estimate relative and absolute concentrations of 24-h urinary C-peptide. In multivariable-adjusted models, we found a significant positive association between all three insulin-related dietary indices and 24-h urinary C-peptide (P &lt; 0·05). Relative concentrations of 24-h urinary C-peptide per 1-sd increase in insulin-related dietary indices were 1·12 (95 % CI 1·02, 1·23) for EDIH, 1·18 (95 % CI 1·07, 1·29) for dietary insulin index and 1·16 (95 % CI 1·06, 1·27) for dietary insulin load. When we further adjusted for BMI, the association was attenuated for EDIH, to 1·07 (95 % CI 0·98, 1·16), and remained unchanged for dietary insulin index and dietary insulin load. In conclusion, EDIH, dietary insulin index and dietary insulin load were predictive of integrated insulin secretion assessed by 24-h urinary C-peptide. Findings after adjustment for BMI appear to confirm the relation of EDIH to insulin resistance and dietary insulin index/load to insulin secretion; the respective constructs of the two dietary indices.</pubmed_abstract><journal>The British journal of nutrition</journal><pagination>1-8</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC7749049</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Insulin-related dietary indices predict 24-h urinary C-peptide in adult men.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC7749049</pmcid><funding_grant_id>R01 HL035464</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R00 CA207736</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UM1 CA167552</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U01 CA167552</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>K99 CA207736</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Giovannucci EL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tabung FK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lee DH</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Insulin-related dietary indices predict 24-h urinary C-peptide in adult men.</name><description>The dietary insulin index directly estimates the postprandial insulin secretion potential of foods, whereas the empirical dietary index for hyperinsulinaemia (EDIH) assesses the insulinaemic potential of usual diets based on fasting plasma C-peptide, and is primarily reflective of insulin resistance. It is unknown whether these insulin-related indices are predictive of an integrated measure of insulin secretion. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis that included 293 non-diabetic men with 24-h urinary C-peptide data from the Men's Lifestyle Validation Study. EDIH, dietary insulin index and dietary insulin load were calculated using validated FFQ. We conducted multivariable-adjusted linear regression to estimate relative and absolute concentrations of 24-h urinary C-peptide. In multivariable-adjusted models, we found a significant positive association between all three insulin-related dietary indices and 24-h urinary C-peptide (P &lt; 0·05). Relative concentrations of 24-h urinary C-peptide per 1-sd increase in insulin-related dietary indices were 1·12 (95 % CI 1·02, 1·23) for EDIH, 1·18 (95 % CI 1·07, 1·29) for dietary insulin index and 1·16 (95 % CI 1·06, 1·27) for dietary insulin load. When we further adjusted for BMI, the association was attenuated for EDIH, to 1·07 (95 % CI 0·98, 1·16), and remained unchanged for dietary insulin index and dietary insulin load. In conclusion, EDIH, dietary insulin index and dietary insulin load were predictive of integrated insulin secretion assessed by 24-h urinary C-peptide. Findings after adjustment for BMI appear to confirm the relation of EDIH to insulin resistance and dietary insulin index/load to insulin secretion; the respective constructs of the two dietary indices.</description><dates><release>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2020 Jun</publication><modification>2024-11-08T18:25:35.107Z</modification><creation>2024-11-08T18:25:35.107Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC7749049</accession><cross_references><pubmed>32618519</pubmed><doi>10.1017/S0007114520002184</doi><doi>10.1017/s0007114520002184</doi></cross_references></HashMap>