<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Kierstead EC</submitter><funding>DC Metro Tobacco Research and Instruction Consortium</funding><funding>NIAID NIH HHS</funding><pagination>2</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC7789216</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>14(1)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>Morbidity and mortality from smoking-related diseases among people living with HIV (PLWH) in the U.S. surpasses that due to HIV itself. Conventional smoking cessation treatments have not demonstrated strong efficacy among PLWH. We conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate a tailored smoking cessation intervention based on the minority stress model. We compared standard of care counseling (SOC) to a tailored intervention (TI) including one face-to-face counseling session incorporating cognitive behavioral therapy to build resilience, and 30 days of 2-way text messaging.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>The primary outcome was smoking cessation. Secondary outcomes included cigarettes per day (CPD), exhaled carbon monoxide (CO), and cessation self-efficacy. A total of 25 participants were enrolled (TI:11, SOC:14), and 2 were lost to follow-up. There were no significant differences in quit rates between study groups. However, there was a significantly greater decrease in CPD in the TI versus SOC (13.5 vs. 0.0, p-value:0.036). Additionally, self-efficacy increased in both groups (TI p-value:0.012, SOC p-value:0.049) and CO decreased in both groups (TI p-value: &lt; 0.001, SOC p-value:0.049). This intervention shows promise to support smoking cessation among PLWH. A larger study is needed to fully evaluate the efficacy of this approach.&lt;h4>Clinical trial&lt;/h4>Trial Registration: Retrospectively registered (10/20/2020) NCT04594109.</pubmed_abstract><journal>BMC research notes</journal><pubmed_title>A pilot randomized controlled trial of a tailored smoking cessation program for people living with HIV in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC7789216</pmcid><funding_grant_id>P30 AI117970</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>AI117970</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Horn K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Debnam C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Spielberg F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kierstead EC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Niaura R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Abroms LC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Stanton CA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gray T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cohn AM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sanchez D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Magnus M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Elf JL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Patel M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Harvey E</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>A pilot randomized controlled trial of a tailored smoking cessation program for people living with HIV in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area.</name><description>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>Morbidity and mortality from smoking-related diseases among people living with HIV (PLWH) in the U.S. surpasses that due to HIV itself. Conventional smoking cessation treatments have not demonstrated strong efficacy among PLWH. We conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate a tailored smoking cessation intervention based on the minority stress model. We compared standard of care counseling (SOC) to a tailored intervention (TI) including one face-to-face counseling session incorporating cognitive behavioral therapy to build resilience, and 30 days of 2-way text messaging.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>The primary outcome was smoking cessation. Secondary outcomes included cigarettes per day (CPD), exhaled carbon monoxide (CO), and cessation self-efficacy. A total of 25 participants were enrolled (TI:11, SOC:14), and 2 were lost to follow-up. There were no significant differences in quit rates between study groups. However, there was a significantly greater decrease in CPD in the TI versus SOC (13.5 vs. 0.0, p-value:0.036). Additionally, self-efficacy increased in both groups (TI p-value:0.012, SOC p-value:0.049) and CO decreased in both groups (TI p-value: &lt; 0.001, SOC p-value:0.049). This intervention shows promise to support smoking cessation among PLWH. A larger study is needed to fully evaluate the efficacy of this approach.&lt;h4>Clinical trial&lt;/h4>Trial Registration: Retrospectively registered (10/20/2020) NCT04594109.</description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021 Jan</publication><modification>2024-02-16T20:19:30.85Z</modification><creation>2021-02-20T21:00:23Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC7789216</accession><cross_references><pubmed>33407848</pubmed><doi>10.1186/s13104-020-05417-3</doi></cross_references></HashMap>