<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>10(1)</volume><submitter>Sciarra A</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Aim of this study was to correlate perineural invasion (PNI) with other clinical-pathological parameters in terms of prognostic indicators in prostate cancer (PC) cases at the time of radical prostatectomy (RP).&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Prospective study of 288 consecutive PC cases undergoing RP. PNI determination was performed either in biopsy or in RP specimens classifying as uni- and multifocal PNI. The median follow-up time was 22 (range, 6-36) months.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>At biopsy PNI was found in 34 (11.8%) cases and in 202 (70.1%) cases at the time of surgery. Among those identified at RP 133 (46.1%) and 69 (23.9%) cases had uni- and multi-PNI, respectively. Presence of PNI was significantly (P&lt;0.05) correlated with unfavorable pathological parameters such higher stage and grade. The percentage of extracapsular extension in PNI negative RP specimens was 18.6% &lt;i>vs.&lt;/i> 60.4% of PNI positive specimens. However, the distribution of pathological staging and International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading did not vary according to whether PNI was uni- or multifocal. The risk of biochemical progression increased 2.3 times in PNI positive cases was significantly associated with the risk of biochemical progression (r=0.136; P=0.04). However, at multivariate analysis PNI was not significantly associated with biochemical progression [hazard ratio (HR): 1.87, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.68-3.12; P=0.089]. Within patients with intermediate risk disease, multifocal PNI was able to predict cases with lower mean time to biochemical and progression free survival (chi-square 5.95; P=0.04).&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>PNI at biopsy is not a good predictor of the PNI incidence at the time of RP. PNI detection in surgical specimens may help stratify intermediate risk cases for the risk of biochemical progression.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Translational andrology and urology</journal><pagination>66-76</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC7844528</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Impact of uni- or multifocal perineural invasion in prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC7844528</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Panebianco V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Salciccia S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Maggi M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>De Berardinis E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Magliocca FM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ciardi A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chung BI</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Frisenda M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Busetto GM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gentilucci A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sciarra A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gallucci M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>de Cobelli O</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ferro M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Del Proposto A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kasman AM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Del Giudice F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Di Pierro GB</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Impact of uni- or multifocal perineural invasion in prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Aim of this study was to correlate perineural invasion (PNI) with other clinical-pathological parameters in terms of prognostic indicators in prostate cancer (PC) cases at the time of radical prostatectomy (RP).&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Prospective study of 288 consecutive PC cases undergoing RP. PNI determination was performed either in biopsy or in RP specimens classifying as uni- and multifocal PNI. The median follow-up time was 22 (range, 6-36) months.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>At biopsy PNI was found in 34 (11.8%) cases and in 202 (70.1%) cases at the time of surgery. Among those identified at RP 133 (46.1%) and 69 (23.9%) cases had uni- and multi-PNI, respectively. Presence of PNI was significantly (P&lt;0.05) correlated with unfavorable pathological parameters such higher stage and grade. The percentage of extracapsular extension in PNI negative RP specimens was 18.6% &lt;i>vs.&lt;/i> 60.4% of PNI positive specimens. However, the distribution of pathological staging and International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading did not vary according to whether PNI was uni- or multifocal. The risk of biochemical progression increased 2.3 times in PNI positive cases was significantly associated with the risk of biochemical progression (r=0.136; P=0.04). However, at multivariate analysis PNI was not significantly associated with biochemical progression [hazard ratio (HR): 1.87, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.68-3.12; P=0.089]. Within patients with intermediate risk disease, multifocal PNI was able to predict cases with lower mean time to biochemical and progression free survival (chi-square 5.95; P=0.04).&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>PNI at biopsy is not a good predictor of the PNI incidence at the time of RP. PNI detection in surgical specimens may help stratify intermediate risk cases for the risk of biochemical progression.</description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021 Jan</publication><modification>2025-04-05T14:47:23.167Z</modification><creation>2025-02-19T01:41:00.334Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC7844528</accession><cross_references><pubmed>33532297</pubmed><doi>10.21037/tau-20-850</doi></cross_references></HashMap>