<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><submitter>Zhuo X</submitter><funding>NIDA NIH HHS</funding><funding>NIEHS NIH HHS</funding><funding>NHGRI NIH HHS</funding><funding>NCI NIH HHS</funding><pubmed_abstract>Structural variation (SV), including insertions and deletions (indels), is a primary mechanism of genome evolution. However, the mechanism by which SV contributes to epigenome evolution is poorly understood. In this study, we characterized the association between lineage-specific indels and epigenome differences between human and chimpanzee to investigate how SVs might have shaped the epigenetic landscape. By intersecting medium-to-large human-chimpanzee indels (20bp-50kb) with putative promoters and enhancers in cranial neural crest cells (CNCC) and repressed regions in induced pluripotent cells (iPSC), we found that ~12% indels overlap putative regulatory and repressed regions (RRRs), and 15% of these indels are associated with lineage-biased RRRs. Indel-associated putative enhancer and repressive regions are ~1.3 and ~3 times as likely to be lineage-biased, respectively, as those not associated with indels. We found a 2-fold enrichment of medium-sized indels (20bp to 50bp) in CpG island (CGI)-containing promoters than expected by chance. Lastly, from human-specific transposable element insertions, we identified putative regulatory elements, including NR2F1-bound putative CNCC enhancers derived from SVAs and putative iPSC promoters derived from LTR5s. Our results demonstrate that different types of indels are associated with specific epigenomic diversity between human and chimpanzee.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Genome research</journal><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC7849402</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Epigenomic differences in the human and chimpanzee genomes are associated with structural variation.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC7849402</pmcid><funding_grant_id>U24 ES026699</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R25 DA027995</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U01 CA200060</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U01 HG009391</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 HG007175</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U41 HG010972</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>T32 HG000045</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Zhuo X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Du AY</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Li D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wang T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pehrsson EC</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Epigenomic differences in the human and chimpanzee genomes are associated with structural variation.</name><description>Structural variation (SV), including insertions and deletions (indels), is a primary mechanism of genome evolution. However, the mechanism by which SV contributes to epigenome evolution is poorly understood. In this study, we characterized the association between lineage-specific indels and epigenome differences between human and chimpanzee to investigate how SVs might have shaped the epigenetic landscape. By intersecting medium-to-large human-chimpanzee indels (20bp-50kb) with putative promoters and enhancers in cranial neural crest cells (CNCC) and repressed regions in induced pluripotent cells (iPSC), we found that ~12% indels overlap putative regulatory and repressed regions (RRRs), and 15% of these indels are associated with lineage-biased RRRs. Indel-associated putative enhancer and repressive regions are ~1.3 and ~3 times as likely to be lineage-biased, respectively, as those not associated with indels. We found a 2-fold enrichment of medium-sized indels (20bp to 50bp) in CpG island (CGI)-containing promoters than expected by chance. Lastly, from human-specific transposable element insertions, we identified putative regulatory elements, including NR2F1-bound putative CNCC enhancers derived from SVAs and putative iPSC promoters derived from LTR5s. Our results demonstrate that different types of indels are associated with specific epigenomic diversity between human and chimpanzee.</description><dates><release>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2020 Dec</publication><modification>2022-02-11T01:52:18.888Z</modification><creation>2022-02-11T01:52:18.888Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC7849402</accession><cross_references><pubmed>33303495</pubmed><doi>10.1101/gr.263491.120</doi></cross_references></HashMap>