<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>106(2)</volume><submitter>Wagner-Drouet E</submitter><pubmed_abstract>Recurrence of cytomegalovirus reactivation remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Monitoring cytomegalovirus-specific cellular immunity using a standardized assay might improve the risk stratification of patients. A prospective multicenter study was conducted in 175 intermediate- and high-risk allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients under preemptive antiviral therapy. Cytomegalovirus-specific cellular immunity was measured using a standardized IFN-? ELISpot assay (T-Track® CMV). Primary aim was to evaluate the suitability of measuring cytomegalovirus-specific immunity after end of treatment for a first cytomegalovirus reactivation to predict recurrent reactivation. 40/101 (39.6%) patients with a first cytomegalovirus reactivation experienced recurrent reactivations, mainly in the high-risk group (cytomegalovirus-seronegative donor/cytomegalovirus-seropositive recipient). The positive predictive value of T-Track® CMV (patients with a negative test after the first reactivation experienced at least one recurrent reactivation) was 84.2% in high-risk patients. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a higher probability of recurrent cytomegalovirus reactivation in high-risk patients with a negative test after the first reactivation (hazard ratio 2.73; p=0.007). Interestingly, a post-hoc analysis considering T-Track® CMV measurements at day 100 post-transplantation, a time point highly relevant for outpatient care, showed a positive predictive value of 90.0% in high-risk patients. Our results indicate that standardized cytomegalovirus-specific cellular immunity monitoring may allow improved risk stratification and management of recurrent cytomegalovirus reactivation after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. This study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02156479.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Haematologica</journal><pagination>363-374</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC7849569</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Standardized monitoring of cytomegalovirus-specific immunity can improve risk stratification of recurrent cytomegalovirus reactivation after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC7849569</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Teschner D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rascle A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wolschke C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gartner J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ditschkowski M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Verbeek M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Janson D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kondakci M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Koch M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wolff D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hunig T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mielke S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Heidenreich D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schafer-Eckart K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schmidt T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schreder M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gromke T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Klein S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Grass S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Deml L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kreil S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wagner-Drouet E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>von Lilienfeld-Toal M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Barabas S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hilgendorf I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lindemann M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wagner R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kobbe G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Guldan H</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Standardized monitoring of cytomegalovirus-specific immunity can improve risk stratification of recurrent cytomegalovirus reactivation after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.</name><description>Recurrence of cytomegalovirus reactivation remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Monitoring cytomegalovirus-specific cellular immunity using a standardized assay might improve the risk stratification of patients. A prospective multicenter study was conducted in 175 intermediate- and high-risk allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients under preemptive antiviral therapy. Cytomegalovirus-specific cellular immunity was measured using a standardized IFN-? ELISpot assay (T-Track® CMV). Primary aim was to evaluate the suitability of measuring cytomegalovirus-specific immunity after end of treatment for a first cytomegalovirus reactivation to predict recurrent reactivation. 40/101 (39.6%) patients with a first cytomegalovirus reactivation experienced recurrent reactivations, mainly in the high-risk group (cytomegalovirus-seronegative donor/cytomegalovirus-seropositive recipient). The positive predictive value of T-Track® CMV (patients with a negative test after the first reactivation experienced at least one recurrent reactivation) was 84.2% in high-risk patients. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a higher probability of recurrent cytomegalovirus reactivation in high-risk patients with a negative test after the first reactivation (hazard ratio 2.73; p=0.007). Interestingly, a post-hoc analysis considering T-Track® CMV measurements at day 100 post-transplantation, a time point highly relevant for outpatient care, showed a positive predictive value of 90.0% in high-risk patients. Our results indicate that standardized cytomegalovirus-specific cellular immunity monitoring may allow improved risk stratification and management of recurrent cytomegalovirus reactivation after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. This study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02156479.</description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021 Feb</publication><modification>2021-02-21T06:49:33Z</modification><creation>2021-02-21T06:49:33Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC7849569</accession><cross_references><pubmed>31879324</pubmed><doi>10.3324/haematol.2019.229252</doi></cross_references></HashMap>