<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>147(5)</volume><submitter>Tay JK</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Importance&lt;/h4>Three-dimensionally printed nasopharyngeal swabs (3DP swabs) have been used to mitigate swab shortages during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Clinical validation for diagnostic accuracy and consistency, as well as patient acceptability, is crucial to evaluate the swab's performance.&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>To determine the accuracy and acceptability of the 3DP swab for identifying severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).&lt;h4>Design, setting, and participants&lt;/h4>A diagnostic study was conducted from May to July 2020 at 2 tertiary care centers in Singapore with different reference swabs (FLOQSwab [COPAN Diagnostics] or Dacron swab [Deltalab]) and swab processing techniques (wet or dry) to evaluate the performance of the 3DP swab compared wit</pubmed_abstract><journal>JAMA otolaryngology-- head &amp; neck surgery</journal><pagination>418-425</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC7893548</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Design and Multicenter Clinical Validation of a 3-Dimensionally Printed Nasopharyngeal Swab for SARS-CoV-2 Testing.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC7893548</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Siow CH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lim ZY</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wong JEL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Loh WS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ko K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ngiam N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chan KS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Saraf A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Toh ST</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Oon L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chua YY</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wang Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tan TT</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yen CC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gan SW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tan HK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lian DWQ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Allen DM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chow VTK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chow WTE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Loh J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tay JK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Goh HL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lim CM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lee CK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chee J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cross GB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fuh JYH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yan B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Loh KS</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Design and Multicenter Clinical Validation of a 3-Dimensionally Printed Nasopharyngeal Swab for SARS-CoV-2 Testing.</name><description>&lt;h4>Importance&lt;/h4>Three-dimensionally printed nasopharyngeal swabs (3DP swabs) have been used to mitigate swab shortages during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Clinical validation for diagnostic accuracy and consistency, as well as patient acceptability, is crucial to evaluate the swab's performance.&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>To determine the accuracy and acceptability of the 3DP swab for identifying severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).&lt;h4>Design, setting, and participants&lt;/h4>A diagnostic study was conducted from May to July 2020 at 2 tertiary care centers in Singapore with different reference swabs (FLOQSwab [COPAN Diagnostics] or Dacron swab [Deltalab]) and swab processing techniques (wet or dry) to evaluate the performance of the 3DP swab compared wit</description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021 May</publication><modification>2025-04-04T19:54:32.193Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T19:54:32.193Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC7893548</accession><cross_references><pubmed>33599684</pubmed><doi>10.1001/jamaoto.2020.5680</doi></cross_references></HashMap>