<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>34(2)</volume><submitter>Kamal F</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Heller myotomy (HM) is an established treatment for achalasia but can fail in up to 10-20% of patients. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) may be an appropriate treatment for patients with failed HM.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We searched several databases to identify non-comparative studies evaluating the efficacy and/or safety of POEM after failed HM and comparative studies comparing the efficacy and/or safety of POEM in patients with and without prior HM. Outcomes assessed included clinical success, technical success, adverse events, post-treatment gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and presence of esophagitis on endoscopy. We calculated weighted pooled rates with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for all outcomes in patients undergoing POEM with prior HM. We calculated pooled od</pubmed_abstract><journal>Annals of gastroenterology</journal><pagination>155-163</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC7903572</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Efficacy and safety of peroral endoscopic myotomy in the management of recurrent achalasia after failed Heller myotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC7903572</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Marella HK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Heda RP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sharma S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tombazzi C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Khan Z</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Adler DG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ismail MK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kamal F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lee-Smith W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tariq R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Howden CW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Khan MA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sharaiha RZ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>McDonough S</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Efficacy and safety of peroral endoscopic myotomy in the management of recurrent achalasia after failed Heller myotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Heller myotomy (HM) is an established treatment for achalasia but can fail in up to 10-20% of patients. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) may be an appropriate treatment for patients with failed HM.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We searched several databases to identify non-comparative studies evaluating the efficacy and/or safety of POEM after failed HM and comparative studies comparing the efficacy and/or safety of POEM in patients with and without prior HM. Outcomes assessed included clinical success, technical success, adverse events, post-treatment gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and presence of esophagitis on endoscopy. We calculated weighted pooled rates with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for all outcomes in patients undergoing POEM with prior HM. We calculated pooled od</description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021</publication><modification>2025-04-26T05:59:39.086Z</modification><creation>2021-03-05T08:08:50Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC7903572</accession><cross_references><pubmed>33654353</pubmed><doi>10.20524/aog.2020.0563</doi></cross_references></HashMap>