{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"submitter":["Yuan P"],"funding":["the Chinese Medical Association clinical medical research special fund, Research and development of young physicians in reproductive medicine","Guangzhou Science and Technology Project","the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province","the National Natural Science Foundation of China"],"pagination":["709-718"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC7910334"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["38(3)"],"pubmed_abstract":["<h4>Purpose</h4>The aim of this study was to determine factors affecting the chromosome imbalance in blastocysts and reproductive outcomes by a comparison between the reciprocal translocation (REC), inversion (INV), and Robertsonian translocation (ROB) carriers.<h4>Methods</h4>Couples with one partner carrying translocation or inversion underwent preimplantation genetic testing for chromosomal structural rearrangement (PGT-SR) cycles, including 215 PGT-SR cycles performed in subsequent 164 frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles and 61 prenatal diagnoses of fetuses and 59 normal live birth babies. A total of 899 samples were processed by whole-genome amplification followed by next-generation sequencing (NGS). Karyotype and chromosome microarray analyses were used to confirm the PGT results fr"],"journal":["Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics"],"pubmed_title":["Evaluation of chromosomal abnormalities from preimplantation genetic testing to the reproductive outcomes: a comparison between three different structural rearrangements based on next-generation sequencing."],"pmcid":["PMC7910334"],"funding_grant_id":["201704020217","2019A1515012005","81801431","18010060735"],"pubmed_authors":["Yuan P","Tan X","Zheng L","Wang W","Li R","Luo H","Ou S","Zhang Q","Zhao H"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Evaluation of chromosomal abnormalities from preimplantation genetic testing to the reproductive outcomes: a comparison between three different structural rearrangements based on next-generation sequencing.","description":"<h4>Purpose</h4>The aim of this study was to determine factors affecting the chromosome imbalance in blastocysts and reproductive outcomes by a comparison between the reciprocal translocation (REC), inversion (INV), and Robertsonian translocation (ROB) carriers.<h4>Methods</h4>Couples with one partner carrying translocation or inversion underwent preimplantation genetic testing for chromosomal structural rearrangement (PGT-SR) cycles, including 215 PGT-SR cycles performed in subsequent 164 frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles and 61 prenatal diagnoses of fetuses and 59 normal live birth babies. A total of 899 samples were processed by whole-genome amplification followed by next-generation sequencing (NGS). Karyotype and chromosome microarray analyses were used to confirm the PGT results fr","dates":{"release":"2021-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2021 Mar","modification":"2025-04-04T13:21:36.338Z","creation":"2025-04-04T13:21:36.338Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC7910334","cross_references":{"pubmed":["33409753"],"doi":["10.1007/s10815-020-02053-5"]}}