<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>27</volume><submitter>Mohamed MFH</submitter><pubmed_abstract>Cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) carries significant morbidity and mortality. Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) remains the standard of care, with recent systematic studies suggesting the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban in the treatment of CAT. Uncertainty, however, remains regarding rivaroxaban efficacy and safety in real-world settings. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing rivaroxaban to LMWH. We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE. The primary outcome was the net clinical benefit (NCB), while rates of major bleeding (MB), venous thromboembolism (VTE), clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (CRNMB), and all-cause mortality events were secondary outcomes. Seventeen studies were included in the final analysis. Rivaroxaban had a better NCB (relative</pubmed_abstract><journal>Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis</journal><pagination>1076029620940046</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC7930650</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>The Net Clinical Benefit of Rivaroxaban Compared to Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin in the Treatment of Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC7930650</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Ahmed MB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mohamed MFH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ahmed I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Abdalla LO</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Danjuma MI</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>ElShafei MN</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Elzouki AN</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>The Net Clinical Benefit of Rivaroxaban Compared to Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin in the Treatment of Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.</name><description>Cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) carries significant morbidity and mortality. Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) remains the standard of care, with recent systematic studies suggesting the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban in the treatment of CAT. Uncertainty, however, remains regarding rivaroxaban efficacy and safety in real-world settings. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing rivaroxaban to LMWH. We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE. The primary outcome was the net clinical benefit (NCB), while rates of major bleeding (MB), venous thromboembolism (VTE), clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (CRNMB), and all-cause mortality events were secondary outcomes. Seventeen studies were included in the final analysis. Rivaroxaban had a better NCB (relative</description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021 Jan-Dec</publication><modification>2026-05-08T09:41:55.003Z</modification><creation>2021-03-16T08:15:41Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC7930650</accession><cross_references><pubmed>33651658</pubmed><doi>10.1177/1076029620940046</doi></cross_references></HashMap>