<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>35(3)</volume><submitter>Kuendgen A</submitter><pubmed_abstract>In the current World Health Organization (WHO)-classification, therapy-related myelodysplastic syndromes (t-MDS) are categorized together with therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and t-myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms into one subgroup independent of morphologic or prognostic features. Analyzing data of 2087 t-MDS patients from different international MDS groups to evaluate classification and prognostication tools we found that applying the WHO classification for p-MDS successfully predicts time to transformation and survival (both p &lt; 0.001). The results regarding carefully reviewed cytogenetic data, classifications, and prognostic scores confirmed that t-MDS are similarly heterogeneous as p-MDS and therefore deserve the same careful differentiation regarding risk. As</pubmed_abstract><journal>Leukemia</journal><pagination>835-849</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC7932916</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Therapy-related myelodysplastic syndromes deserve specific diagnostic sub-classification and risk-stratification-an approach to classification of patients with t-MDS.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC7932916</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Tuechler H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pfeilstocker M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sill H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hildebrandt B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Xicoy B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pedro C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Baldus CD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Haase D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kuendgen A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Costa D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Esteve J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Garcia-Manero G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Valent P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lubbert M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>DeZern AE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Haas R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cobo F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cazzola M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Oiartzabal I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Diez-Campelo M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sole F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Komrokji RS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ganster C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Germing U</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Calvo X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Roboz GJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schroeder T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Giagounidis A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sanz G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nomdedeu B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lopez-Pavia M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nomdedeu M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cedena MT</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Van de Loosdrecht AA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Machherndl-Spandl S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schlenk RF</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dohner H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Stauder R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Platzbecker U</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pereira A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Merchan B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Greenberg PL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Della Porta MG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Steensma DP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sekeres MA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>List A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Grau J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Martinez-de-Sola M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Voso MT</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Blum S</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Therapy-related myelodysplastic syndromes deserve specific diagnostic sub-classification and risk-stratification-an approach to classification of patients with t-MDS.</name><description>In the current World Health Organization (WHO)-classification, therapy-related myelodysplastic syndromes (t-MDS) are categorized together with therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and t-myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms into one subgroup independent of morphologic or prognostic features. Analyzing data of 2087 t-MDS patients from different international MDS groups to evaluate classification and prognostication tools we found that applying the WHO classification for p-MDS successfully predicts time to transformation and survival (both p &lt; 0.001). The results regarding carefully reviewed cytogenetic data, classifications, and prognostic scores confirmed that t-MDS are similarly heterogeneous as p-MDS and therefore deserve the same careful differentiation regarding risk. As</description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021 Mar</publication><modification>2025-04-20T02:30:01.018Z</modification><creation>2025-04-20T02:30:01.018Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC7932916</accession><cross_references><pubmed>32595214</pubmed><doi>10.1038/s41375-020-0917-7</doi></cross_references></HashMap>