<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Norton EL</submitter><funding>NHLBI NIH HHS</funding><funding>National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute</funding><pagination>873-884.e2</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC7935741</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>161(3)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>The study objective was to determine if hemiarch replacement is an adequate arch management strategy for patients with acute type A aortic dissection and arch branch vessel dissection but no cerebral malperfusion.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>From January 2008 to August 2019, 479 patients underwent open acute type A aortic dissection repair. After excluding those with aggressive arch replacement (n = 168), cerebral malperfusion syndrome (n = 34), and indeterminable arch branch vessel dissection (n = 1), 276 patients with an acute type A aortic dissection without cerebral malperfusion syndrome who underwent hemiarch replacement comprised this study. Patients were then divided into those with arch branch vessel dissection (n = 133) and those with no arch branch vessel dissection (n = 143</pubmed_abstract><journal>The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery</journal><pubmed_title>Is hemiarch replacement adequate in acute type A aortic dissection repair in patients with arch branch vessel dissection without cerebral malperfusion?</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC7935741</pmcid><funding_grant_id>K08 HL130614</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 HL141891</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 HL151776</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Fukuhara S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Patel HJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Deeb GM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Norton EL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kim KM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yang B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wu X</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Is hemiarch replacement adequate in acute type A aortic dissection repair in patients with arch branch vessel dissection without cerebral malperfusion?</name><description>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>The study objective was to determine if hemiarch replacement is an adequate arch management strategy for patients with acute type A aortic dissection and arch branch vessel dissection but no cerebral malperfusion.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>From January 2008 to August 2019, 479 patients underwent open acute type A aortic dissection repair. After excluding those with aggressive arch replacement (n = 168), cerebral malperfusion syndrome (n = 34), and indeterminable arch branch vessel dissection (n = 1), 276 patients with an acute type A aortic dissection without cerebral malperfusion syndrome who underwent hemiarch replacement comprised this study. Patients were then divided into those with arch branch vessel dissection (n = 133) and those with no arch branch vessel dissection (n = 143</description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021 Mar</publication><modification>2025-04-04T10:16:52.218Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T10:16:52.218Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC7935741</accession><cross_references><pubmed>33451835</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.10.160</doi></cross_references></HashMap>