<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>33</volume><submitter>Yoshida T</submitter><funding>Tokyo Jikeikai Ika Daigaku</funding><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Sustained new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) in the intensive care unit has been reported to be associated with poor outcomes. However, in critical illness, whether rhythm-control therapy can achieve sinus rhythm (SR) restoration is unknown. This study aimed to assess the impact of rhythm-control therapy on SR restoration for new-onset AF in critically ill patients.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>This post-hoc analysis of a prospective multicenter observational study involving 32 Japan intensive care units compared patients with and without rhythm-control therapy for new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) and conducted a multivariable analysis using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis including rhythm-control therapy as a time-varying covariate for SR restoration.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Of 423 new-onset AF patients, 178 patients (42%) underwent rhythm-control therapy. Among those patients, 131 (31%) underwent rhythm-control therapy within 6 h after AF onset. Magnesium sulphate was the most frequently used rhythm-control drug. The Cox proportional hazards model for SR restoration showed that rhythm-control therapy had a significant positive association with SR restoration (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.46; 95% confidence interval: 1.16-1.85). However, the rhythm-control group had numerically higher hospital mortality than the non-rhythm-control group (31% vs. 23%, p = 0.09).&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Rhythm-control therapy for new-onset AF in critically ill patients was associated with SR restoration. However, patients with rhythm-control therapy had poorer prognosis, possibly due to selection bias. These findings may provide important insight for the design and feasibility of interventional studies assessing rhythm-control therapy in new-onset AF.</pubmed_abstract><journal>International journal of cardiology. Heart &amp; vasculature</journal><pagination>100742</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC7937754</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Rhythm-control therapy for new-onset atrial fibrillation in critically ill patients: A post hoc analysis from the prospective multicenter observational AFTER-ICU study.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC7937754</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Uchino S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yoshida T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kyo M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>AFTER-ICU Study Group</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sasabuchi Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Igarashi T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Inoue H</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Rhythm-control therapy for new-onset atrial fibrillation in critically ill patients: A post hoc analysis from the prospective multicenter observational AFTER-ICU study.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Sustained new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) in the intensive care unit has been reported to be associated with poor outcomes. However, in critical illness, whether rhythm-control therapy can achieve sinus rhythm (SR) restoration is unknown. This study aimed to assess the impact of rhythm-control therapy on SR restoration for new-onset AF in critically ill patients.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>This post-hoc analysis of a prospective multicenter observational study involving 32 Japan intensive care units compared patients with and without rhythm-control therapy for new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) and conducted a multivariable analysis using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis including rhythm-control therapy as a time-varying covariate for SR restoration.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Of 423 new-onset AF patients, 178 patients (42%) underwent rhythm-control therapy. Among those patients, 131 (31%) underwent rhythm-control therapy within 6 h after AF onset. Magnesium sulphate was the most frequently used rhythm-control drug. The Cox proportional hazards model for SR restoration showed that rhythm-control therapy had a significant positive association with SR restoration (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.46; 95% confidence interval: 1.16-1.85). However, the rhythm-control group had numerically higher hospital mortality than the non-rhythm-control group (31% vs. 23%, p = 0.09).&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Rhythm-control therapy for new-onset AF in critically ill patients was associated with SR restoration. However, patients with rhythm-control therapy had poorer prognosis, possibly due to selection bias. These findings may provide important insight for the design and feasibility of interventional studies assessing rhythm-control therapy in new-onset AF.</description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021 Apr</publication><modification>2024-11-21T04:50:21.847Z</modification><creation>2024-11-21T04:50:21.847Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC7937754</accession><cross_references><pubmed>33732869</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.ijcha.2021.100742</doi></cross_references></HashMap>