<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Hermans BJM</submitter><funding>Netherlands Heart Foundation</funding><funding>Electrophysiological DGK</funding><funding>Theo-Rossi di Montelera (TRM) foundation</funding><funding>Vascular Destabilisation</funding><funding>European Union</funding><funding>Atrial Fibrillation: Interaction between hyperCoagulability</funding><funding>Health Modifiers in the Elderly</funding><funding>AFibTrainNet</funding><pagination>i48-i54</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC7943360</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>23(23 Suppl 1)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Aims&lt;/h4>We aimed to examine whether routine pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) induces significant ventricular repolarization changes as suggested earlier.&lt;h4>Methods and results&lt;/h4>Five-minute electrocardiograms were recorded at hospital's admission (T-1d), 1 day after the PVI-procedure (T+1d) and at 3 months post-procedure (T+3m) from a registry of consecutive atrial fibrillation (AF) patients scheduled for routine PVI with different PVI modalities (radiofrequency, cryo-ablation, and hybrid). Only patients who were in sinus rhythm at all three recordings (n = 117) were included. QT-intervals and QT-dispersion were evaluated with custom-made software and QTc was calculated using Bazett's, Fridericia's, Framingham's, and Hodges' formulas. Both QT- and RR-intervals were significantly shorter at T+1d (399 ± 37 and 870 ± 141 ms) and T+3m (407 ± 36 and 950 ± 140 ms) compared with baseline (417 ± 36 and 1025 ± 164 ms). There was no statistically significant within-subject difference in QTc Fridericia (T-1d 416 ± 28 ms, T+1d 419 ± 33 ms, and T+3m 414 ± 25 ms) and QT-dispersion (T-1d 18 ± 12 ms, T+1d 21 ± 19 ms, and T+3m 17 ± 12 ms) between the recordings. A multiple linear regression model with age, sex, AF type, ablation technique, first/re-do ablation, and AF recurrence to predict the change in QTc at T+3m with respect to QTc at T-1d did not reach significance which indicates that the change in QTc does not differ between all subgroups (age, sex, AF type, ablation technique, first/re-do ablation, and AF recurrence).&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>Based on our data a routine PVI does not result in a prolongation of QTc in a real-world population. These findings, therefore, suggest that there is no need to intensify post-PVI QT-interval monitoring.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology</journal><pubmed_title>Pulmonary vein isolation in a real-world population does not influence QTc interval.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC7943360</pmcid><funding_grant_id>633196</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>CVON2014-09</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>675351</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Vernooy K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zink MD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hermans BJM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>van Rosmalen F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Delhaas T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pison L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schotten U</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Crijns HJGM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Postema P</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Pulmonary vein isolation in a real-world population does not influence QTc interval.</name><description>&lt;h4>Aims&lt;/h4>We aimed to examine whether routine pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) induces significant ventricular repolarization changes as suggested earlier.&lt;h4>Methods and results&lt;/h4>Five-minute electrocardiograms were recorded at hospital's admission (T-1d), 1 day after the PVI-procedure (T+1d) and at 3 months post-procedure (T+3m) from a registry of consecutive atrial fibrillation (AF) patients scheduled for routine PVI with different PVI modalities (radiofrequency, cryo-ablation, and hybrid). Only patients who were in sinus rhythm at all three recordings (n = 117) were included. QT-intervals and QT-dispersion were evaluated with custom-made software and QTc was calculated using Bazett's, Fridericia's, Framingham's, and Hodges' formulas. Both QT- and RR-intervals were significantly shorter at T+1d (399 ± 37 and 870 ± 141 ms) and T+3m (407 ± 36 and 950 ± 140 ms) compared with baseline (417 ± 36 and 1025 ± 164 ms). There was no statistically significant within-subject difference in QTc Fridericia (T-1d 416 ± 28 ms, T+1d 419 ± 33 ms, and T+3m 414 ± 25 ms) and QT-dispersion (T-1d 18 ± 12 ms, T+1d 21 ± 19 ms, and T+3m 17 ± 12 ms) between the recordings. A multiple linear regression model with age, sex, AF type, ablation technique, first/re-do ablation, and AF recurrence to predict the change in QTc at T+3m with respect to QTc at T-1d did not reach significance which indicates that the change in QTc does not differ between all subgroups (age, sex, AF type, ablation technique, first/re-do ablation, and AF recurrence).&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>Based on our data a routine PVI does not result in a prolongation of QTc in a real-world population. These findings, therefore, suggest that there is no need to intensify post-PVI QT-interval monitoring.</description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021 Mar</publication><modification>2024-02-15T12:15:54.516Z</modification><creation>2021-03-18T08:36:20Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC7943360</accession><cross_references><pubmed>33751076</pubmed><doi>10.1093/europace/euaa390</doi></cross_references></HashMap>