<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>9(4)</volume><submitter>Zhou X</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>The objective is to compare the effects of a self-designed and self-manufactured novel prophylactic ankle brace [Chinese parachute ankle brace (CPAB)] and two ordinary ankle braces on the ankle joint during a half-squat parachute landing (HSPL) via biomechanical assessment.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Twenty elite paratroopers were in four different conditions: no brace, elastic brace, semi-rigid brace, and CPAB. Each participant was instructed to jump off a platform with three different heights, 40, 80, and 120 cm, and land on the force plate in a half-squat posture. The vertical ground reaction forces (vGRFs), joint angles, moments, powers, and works were calculated. After the experiment, every participant completed the questionnaires designed for this study.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Increasing the dropping height increased all of the parameters significantly (P&lt;0.01), except for time to peak vGRF (T-PvGRF). Applying three braces can all slightly increase vGRF (P=0.237) and reduce T-PvGRF by 6-10 ms, as well as decrease the joint angles, velocities, and moments on the sagittal and coronal planes. Wearing CPAB and a semi-rigid brace more efficiently restricted dorsiflexion and inversion (P&lt;0.05), and they both significantly reduced ankle work (t=5.107, P&lt;0.01; t=3.331, P&lt;0.01) and peak power (t=7.237, P&lt;0.01; t=6.711, P&lt;0.01) at 120 cm. The total scores from low-to-high were semi-rigid brace (19.20±2.99), elastic brace (21.91±3.25), and CPAB (23.37±3.08).&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>The CPAB was more effective at restricting ankle joint motion on the coronal and sagittal planes than the other two prophylactic ankle braces. Therefore, the CPAB had the advantages of a novel appearance, high efficiency, and superior comfort, providing a reliable choice for parachute jumping and training in China.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Annals of translational medicine</journal><pagination>318</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC7944281</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>A novel prophylactic Chinese parachute ankle brace.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC7944281</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Liu Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Li Z</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>He Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Liang L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wu D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yan B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhou X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wu X</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>A novel prophylactic Chinese parachute ankle brace.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>The objective is to compare the effects of a self-designed and self-manufactured novel prophylactic ankle brace [Chinese parachute ankle brace (CPAB)] and two ordinary ankle braces on the ankle joint during a half-squat parachute landing (HSPL) via biomechanical assessment.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Twenty elite paratroopers were in four different conditions: no brace, elastic brace, semi-rigid brace, and CPAB. Each participant was instructed to jump off a platform with three different heights, 40, 80, and 120 cm, and land on the force plate in a half-squat posture. The vertical ground reaction forces (vGRFs), joint angles, moments, powers, and works were calculated. After the experiment, every participant completed the questionnaires designed for this study.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Increasing the dropping height increased all of the parameters significantly (P&lt;0.01), except for time to peak vGRF (T-PvGRF). Applying three braces can all slightly increase vGRF (P=0.237) and reduce T-PvGRF by 6-10 ms, as well as decrease the joint angles, velocities, and moments on the sagittal and coronal planes. Wearing CPAB and a semi-rigid brace more efficiently restricted dorsiflexion and inversion (P&lt;0.05), and they both significantly reduced ankle work (t=5.107, P&lt;0.01; t=3.331, P&lt;0.01) and peak power (t=7.237, P&lt;0.01; t=6.711, P&lt;0.01) at 120 cm. The total scores from low-to-high were semi-rigid brace (19.20±2.99), elastic brace (21.91±3.25), and CPAB (23.37±3.08).&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>The CPAB was more effective at restricting ankle joint motion on the coronal and sagittal planes than the other two prophylactic ankle braces. Therefore, the CPAB had the advantages of a novel appearance, high efficiency, and superior comfort, providing a reliable choice for parachute jumping and training in China.</description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021 Feb</publication><modification>2025-04-04T19:24:51.967Z</modification><creation>2025-02-19T01:40:04.056Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC7944281</accession><cross_references><pubmed>33708945</pubmed><doi>10.21037/atm-20-4937</doi></cross_references></HashMap>