<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Hussain A</submitter><funding>NIDDK NIH HHS</funding><funding>NHLBI NIH HHS</funding><funding>National Institutes of Health</funding><funding>CSRD VA</funding><pagination>559-571</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC7945981</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>77(5)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Although intensive blood pressure reduction has cardiovascular benefits, the absolute benefit is greater in those at higher cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk.&lt;h4>Objectives&lt;/h4>This study examined whether N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) helps identify subjects at higher risk for CVD events across systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), or pulse pressure (PP) categories.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Participants from the ARIC (Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities) study visit 4 (1996 to 98) were grouped according to SBP, DBP, or PP categories and further stratified by NT-proBNP categories. Cox regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios for incident CVD (coronary heart disease, ischemic stroke, or heart failure hospitalization) and mortality across combined NT-proBNP and/or BP categories, adjusting for CVD risk factors.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>There were 9,309 participants (age: 62.6 ± 5.6 years; 58.3% women) with 2,416 CVD events over a median follow-up of 16.7 years. Within each SBP, DBP, or PP category, a higher category of NT-proBNP (100 to &lt;300 or 300 pg/ml, compared with NT-proBNP &lt;100 pg/ml) was associated with a graded increased risk for CVD events and mortality. Participants with SBP 130 to 139 mm Hg but NT-proBNP ≥300 pg/ml had a hazards ratio of 3.4 for CVD (95% confidence interval: 2.44 to 4.77) compared with a NT-proBNP of &lt;100 pg/ml and SBP of 140 to 149 mm Hg.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Elevated NT-proBNP is independently associated with CVD and mortality across SBP, DBP, and PP categories and helps identify subjects at the highest risk. Participants with stage 1 hypertension but elevated NT-proBNP had greater cardiovascular risk compared with those with stage 2 SBP but lower NT-proBNP. Future studies are needed to evaluate use of biomarker-based strategies for CVD risk assessment to assist with initiation or intensification of BP treatment.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Journal of the American College of Cardiology</journal><pubmed_title>Association of NT-ProBNP, Blood Pressure, and Cardiovascular Events: The ARIC Study.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC7945981</pmcid><funding_grant_id>K24 HL152440</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 HL150342</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 HL134320</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>HHSN268201700003I</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>HHSN268201700004I</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>HHSN268201700005I</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 HL135008</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>HHSN268201700001I</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>HHSN268201700002I</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>HHSN268201700005C</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 HL143224</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>I01 CX001112</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 DK089174</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>HHSN268201700001C</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>HHSN268201700002C</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>HHSN268201700003C</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>HHSN268201700004C</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>K24 DK106414</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>K24 HL152008</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Hussain A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Virani SS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hoogeveen RC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>de Lemos JA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ballantyne CM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bozkurt B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ndumule C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sun W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Deswal A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Matsushita K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nambi V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shah AM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Selvin E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Aguilar D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>McEvoy JW</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Association of NT-ProBNP, Blood Pressure, and Cardiovascular Events: The ARIC Study.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Although intensive blood pressure reduction has cardiovascular benefits, the absolute benefit is greater in those at higher cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk.&lt;h4>Objectives&lt;/h4>This study examined whether N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) helps identify subjects at higher risk for CVD events across systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), or pulse pressure (PP) categories.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Participants from the ARIC (Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities) study visit 4 (1996 to 98) were grouped according to SBP, DBP, or PP categories and further stratified by NT-proBNP categories. Cox regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios for incident CVD (coronary heart disease, ischemic stroke, or heart failure hospitalization) and mortality across combined NT-proBNP and/or BP categories, adjusting for CVD risk factors.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>There were 9,309 participants (age: 62.6 ± 5.6 years; 58.3% women) with 2,416 CVD events over a median follow-up of 16.7 years. Within each SBP, DBP, or PP category, a higher category of NT-proBNP (100 to &lt;300 or 300 pg/ml, compared with NT-proBNP &lt;100 pg/ml) was associated with a graded increased risk for CVD events and mortality. Participants with SBP 130 to 139 mm Hg but NT-proBNP ≥300 pg/ml had a hazards ratio of 3.4 for CVD (95% confidence interval: 2.44 to 4.77) compared with a NT-proBNP of &lt;100 pg/ml and SBP of 140 to 149 mm Hg.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Elevated NT-proBNP is independently associated with CVD and mortality across SBP, DBP, and PP categories and helps identify subjects at the highest risk. Participants with stage 1 hypertension but elevated NT-proBNP had greater cardiovascular risk compared with those with stage 2 SBP but lower NT-proBNP. Future studies are needed to evaluate use of biomarker-based strategies for CVD risk assessment to assist with initiation or intensification of BP treatment.</description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021 Feb</publication><modification>2025-04-20T03:41:04.451Z</modification><creation>2025-04-20T03:41:04.451Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC7945981</accession><cross_references><pubmed>33538254</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.063</doi></cross_references></HashMap>