<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Leow K</submitter><funding>NIAMS NIH HHS</funding><pagination>e017205</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC7955302</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>10(2)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Background The prognostic importance of abdominal aortic calcification (AAC) viewed on noninvasive imaging modalities remains uncertain. Methods and Results We searched electronic databases (MEDLINE and Embase) until March 2018. Multiple reviewers identified prospective studies reporting AAC and incident cardiovascular events or all-cause mortality. Two independent reviewers assessed eligibility and risk of bias and extracted data. Summary risk ratios (RRs) were estimated using random-effects models comparing the higher AAC groups combined (any or more advanced AAC) to the lowest reported AAC group. We identified 52 studies (46 cohorts, 36 092 participants); only studies of patients with chronic kidney disease (57%) and the general older-elderly (median, 68 years; range, 60-80 years) popul</pubmed_abstract><journal>Journal of the American Heart Association</journal><pubmed_title>Prognostic Value of Abdominal Aortic Calcification: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC7955302</pmcid><funding_grant_id>R01 AR041398</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Schousboe JT</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Szulc P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kiel DP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sim M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bondonno N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sawang M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shaikh H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lim WH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hodgson JM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sharma A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Teixeira-Pinto A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Thompson PL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Craig JC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lewis JR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Prince RL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wong G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Leow K</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Prognostic Value of Abdominal Aortic Calcification: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.</name><description>Background The prognostic importance of abdominal aortic calcification (AAC) viewed on noninvasive imaging modalities remains uncertain. Methods and Results We searched electronic databases (MEDLINE and Embase) until March 2018. Multiple reviewers identified prospective studies reporting AAC and incident cardiovascular events or all-cause mortality. Two independent reviewers assessed eligibility and risk of bias and extracted data. Summary risk ratios (RRs) were estimated using random-effects models comparing the higher AAC groups combined (any or more advanced AAC) to the lowest reported AAC group. We identified 52 studies (46 cohorts, 36 092 participants); only studies of patients with chronic kidney disease (57%) and the general older-elderly (median, 68 years; range, 60-80 years) popul</description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021 Jan</publication><modification>2025-04-04T21:16:03.28Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T21:16:03.28Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC7955302</accession><cross_references><pubmed>33439672</pubmed><doi>10.1161/JAHA.120.017205</doi></cross_references></HashMap>